I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source! _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at> wrote:
I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk%C2%A0______________________________________________... Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly <morph_2016@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source! _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at> wrote:
I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk%C2%A0______________________________________________... Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
You know about [array get] and [array set], do you?
Roman
On Fre, 2017-04-21 at 15:02 +0000, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly morph_2016@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source! _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists. iem.at> wrote:
I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small
- the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My
rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk%C2%A0 _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis tinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis tinfo/pd-list
At the back of my mind, a thought that there must be a vanilla way of doing this. "I'm sure I saw it somewhere..." etc Just as with the [text] objects, I'm gradually emerging from years of using Pd-extended 0.42/43 and realising the power of vanilla.Thanks Roman Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 16:15, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> wrote:
You know about [array get] and [array set], do you?
Roman
On Fre, 2017-04-21 at 15:02 +0000, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly morph_2016@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source! _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists. iem.at> wrote:
I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small
- the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My
rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk%C2%A0 _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis tinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis tinfo/pd-list
2017-04-21 13:30 GMT-03:00 Ed Kelly via Pd-list pd-list@lists.iem.at:
At the back of my mind, a thought that there must be a vanilla way of doing this. "I'm sure I saw it somewhere..." etc Just as with the [text] objects, I'm gradually emerging from years of using Pd-extended 0.42/43 and realising the power of vanilla.
There's this new thing also, called Purr Data, it has all the power of the late extended, plus the power of the current vanilla
just saying...
Hi Ed,
Did I understand correctly the object works in a predictable way in the end?
Sometimes I try to maintain a version of maxlib distributed with deken, and had the impression it worked as expected when I revisited the help-patch.
At the same time, I had the idea that this object, as there are a lot more in Max/MSP and pd-extended, are just convenience objects; could be as well a proper abstraction. Which would have much higher educational value IMHO.
It would be a nice project for the Pd-community as a whole to find the (few) essential objects missing from pd-vanilla and leave the rest of pd-extended as proper legacy; nice to have to get that old patch working, not otherwise not really useful.
Greetings,
Fred Jan
On 21-04-17 17:02, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For *Lone Shark *releases, *Pure Data *software and published *Research*, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk http://sharktracks.co.uk/
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly morph_2016@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source!
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For *Lone Shark *releases, *Pure Data *software and published *Research*, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk http://sharktracks.co.uk/
On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list pd-list@lists.iem.at wrote:
I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib. It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.
I fixed it. Enclosed. Ed
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
For *Lone Shark *releases, *Pure Data *software and published *Research*, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk http://sharktracks.co.uk/ _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Alexandre Torres Porres -
Ed Kelly -
Fred Jan Kraan -
Roman Haefeli