Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or the same size as the source!
 
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk 


On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.iem.at> wrote:


I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib.
It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has been broken for a while.

I fixed it. Enclosed.
Ed
 
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research, go to http://sharktracks.co.uk 
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list