Thank you both, I wasn't aware of the [file] object. I am now exporting the
.wav using [soundfiler], then using [file] to seek past the 44-byte header,
while writing a new file with an arbitrary extension.
All the best,
Sam.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "IOhannes m zmölnig" <zmoelnig(a)iem.at>
> To: pd-list(a)lists.iem.at
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 07:41:18 +0200
> Subject: [PD] Re: Soundfiler export .raw ?
> Am 13. April 2025 19:59:42 MESZ schrieb Sam Ross <samueljohnross(a)gmail.com
> >:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I need to export short .wav files without header data. I can read them
>> using the -raw tag, but would like to write them too. Is this possible?
>>
>> Thanks for your help,
>> Sam.
>>
>
> you could just write an arbitrary sound file (eg .wav) and ignore the
> first 44 byes or do in your reading application?
>
> alternatively, you could also use [file] to remove the header from an
> existing sound file and write it to a new file.
>
> or if you insist, build your own [soundfiler] with [file].
>
> mfg.sfg.jfd
> IOhannes
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Peter P." <peterparker(a)fastmail.com>
> To: pd-list(a)lists.iem.at
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:15:09 +0200
> Subject: [PD] Re: Soundfiler export .raw ?
> * IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig(a)iem.at> [2025-04-14 07:41]:
> > Am 13. April 2025 19:59:42 MESZ schrieb Sam Ross <
> samueljohnross(a)gmail.com>:
> > >Hello there,
> > >
> > >I need to export short .wav files without header data. I can read them
> > >using the -raw tag, but would like to write them too. Is this possible?
> > >
> > >Thanks for your help,
> > >Sam.
> >
> > you could just write an arbitrary sound file (eg .wav) and ignore the
> first 44 byes or do in your reading application?
> >
> > alternatively, you could also use [file] to remove the header from an
> existing sound file and write it to a new file.
> >
> > or if you insist, build your own [soundfiler] with [file].
>
> Or use something like SoX to convert the wav to whatever afterwards?
>
> best, P
>