On Fre, 2017-04-21 at 15:02 +0000, Ed Kelly via Pd-list wrote:
> compiled objects for maxlib/arraycopy
>  
> _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research,
> go to http://sharktracks.co.uk 
>
>
> On Friday, 21 April 2017, 15:53, Ed Kelly <morph_2016@yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
> Correction - I mean it assumed the destination had to be bigger or
> the same size as the source!
>  
> _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research,
> go to http://sharktracks.co.uk 
>
>
> On Friday, 21 April 2017, 14:17, Ed Kelly via Pd-list <pd-list@lists.
> iem.at> wrote:
>
>
> I don't quite know what has happened to arraycopy from maxlib.
> It seems to expect, from the code, that the destination array is
> smaller or the same size as the source array. That's ridiculous. My
> source array is 90 seconds long and the destination arrays are small
> - the duration between two bonk~ events in an audio stream. My
> rechunk~ patch, which I extensively rely on for live sampling, has
> been broken for a while.
>
> I fixed it. Enclosed.
> Ed
>  
> _-_-_-_-_-_-_-^-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
>
> For Lone Shark releases, Pure Data software and published Research,
> go to http://sharktracks.co.uk 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis
> tinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/lis
> tinfo/pd-list