Hi all,
Quick question - is there a way to set a new target object for a [send], in the same way it is possible to send a [set xyz( to a [receive~] to change its source?
Thanks,
robert.
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location you want to send to: [;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123( | [;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1". marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
Hi all,
Quick question - is there a way to set a new target object for a [send], in the same way it is possible to send a [set xyz( to a [receive~] to change its source?
Thanks,
robert.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location you want to send to: [;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123(
[;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1". marius.
I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I should go to bed earlier - thankyou marius.
One issue though.
I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and the positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
robert.
you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some days ago. http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/a... marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location you want to send to: [;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123(
[;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1". marius.
I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I should go to bed earlier - thankyou marius.
One issue though.
I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and the positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
robert.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some days ago. http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/a... marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location you want to send to: [;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123(
[;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1". marius.
I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I should go to bed earlier - thankyou marius.
One issue though.
I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and the positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
robert.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Sweet! I don't remember when you put that in either, I never noticed before. Seems it needs the "symbol" selector in front of the message for the send name, btw. -Chuckk
On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
cheers Miller
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some days ago.
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/a...
marius.
Robert Scott wrote:
On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the
location
you want to send to: [;receiver1 123(
or with variables:
[receiver1 123(
[;$1 $2(
that will send 123 to "receiver1". marius.
I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I
should go
to bed earlier - thankyou marius.
One issue though.
I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and
the
positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
robert.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
Sweet! I don't remember when you put that in either, I never noticed before. Seems it needs the "symbol" selector in front of the message for the send name, btw.
It's new in 0.40. I know, because I've read all of the diff between 0.39-2 and 0.40-2.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
Le dimanche 19 août 2007 à 03:08 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.
Sweet! I don't remember when you put that in either, I never noticed before. Seems it needs the "symbol" selector in front of the message for the send name, btw.
It's new in 0.40. I know, because I've read all of the diff between 0.39-2 and 0.40-2.
yep,
just tried with Pd version 0.40-2 compiled 15:09:57 Dec 5 2006 and it works fine!
O.
Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd 0.40 or 0.41??? frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some days ago. http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/a...
You have confused me with Matteo, who is not to be confused with Matju. ;)
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
You have confused me with Matteo, who is not to be confused with Matju. ;)
You will further learn that in my apartment it is necessary to distinguish between Mathieu and Mattias.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
You have confused me with Matteo, who is not to be confused with Matju. ;)
You will further learn that in my apartment it is necessary to distinguish between Mathieu and Mattias.
thank you for the information. sorry for all the confusion. marius.
moin Robert,
if you're using an older pd, or don't want to update yet, the [sprinkler] external (in CVS and/or pd-extended) acts like a dynamic [send], using its selector (or the first element of its argument list, if the selector is "list", "symbol", or "float") as the name of the send target...
marmosets, Bryan
On 2007-08-19 04:22:18, Robert Scott lists@humanleg.org.uk appears to have written:
I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and the positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
-
Bryan Jurish -
Chuckk Hubbard -
Frank Barknecht -
marius schebella -
Mathieu Bouchard -
Miller Puckette -
Olivier Heinry -
Robert Scott