On 8/18/07, Miller Puckette <mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu> wrote:

I can't remember when I put it in, but "send" with no arguments now
sprouts a second inlet to set the receiver.

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 11:37:10PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
> you are right. although I heard some talking about new features with pd
> 0.40 or 0.41???
> frank barknecht also posted a workaround for variable length lists some
> days ago.
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20070816/a1d74535/attachment.txt
> marius.
>
> Robert Scott wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 August 2007 02:52, marius schebella wrote:
> >> you can use a message and stat with semicolon followed by the location
> >> you want to send to:
> >> [;receiver1 123(
> >>
> >> or with variables:
> >>
> >> [receiver1 123(
> >>
> >> [;$1 $2(
> >>
> >> that will send 123 to "receiver1".
> >> marius.
> >
> > I'd never thought to use a $ as the object selector there - maybe I should go
> > to bed earlier - thankyou marius.
> >
> > One issue though.
> >
> > I'd like to be able to send arbitrary length lists down this send, and the
> > positional parameters wouldn't seem to be able to do this.
> >
> >
> > robert.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list