Alexandre, I rewrote the TouchOSC templates using only vanilla (at least I think it is vanilla). These templates allow one to easily use the TouchOSC program on an iPhone/iPad and Pd.

Not sure this is what you are looking for but thought I’d reply.

If you are interested, you can take a look at the patches here: http://home.lagrange.edu/mturner/MitchWebSite/max_and_pd_stuff.html http://home.lagrange.edu/mturner/MitchWebSite/max_and_pd_stuff.html

— Mitch

On Apr 18, 2021, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

Message: 4 Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 04:21:57 -0300 From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com mailto:porres@gmail.com> To: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at> Subject: [PD] OSC limitations in Vanilla Message-ID: <CAEAsFmjz74E69YZi8x472hafJH55e2Np+mzW9GsVPAuVn3n8-w@mail.gmail.com mailto:CAEAsFmjz74E69YZi8x472hafJH55e2Np+mzW9GsVPAuVn3n8-w@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I asked this on the facebook group, thought I'd ask it here as well. Who cannot be happy with vanilla's OSC support and still needs mrpeach and stuff? I mean, really really need as in there's no way to deal with such OSC tasks in Vanilla. Tell me what exactly please... I know that it can happen and how, I just wanted examples in the real world, and I also believe Vanilla is fine for most use cases.

I just never use OSC as all I do is inside Pd anyway :)

I see [netsend]/[netreceive] make [udpsend]/[udpreceive] obsolete these days for OSC... but we also have [routeOSC] and [packOSC], and in Vanilla's documentation we see this: ~*no attempt is made here to clearly distinguish between the OSC address (symbols) and the following data, nor between blobs and lists of numbers - it is assumed that you know what types the message should contain. You can alternatively use the OSC objects from mrpeach which have more features than these.*~

cheers