On Apr 18, 2021, at 6:00 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2021 04:21:57 -0300
From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>
To: Pd-List <pd-list@lists.iem.at>
Subject: [PD] OSC limitations in Vanilla
Message-ID:
<CAEAsFmjz74E69YZi8x472hafJH55e2Np+mzW9GsVPAuVn3n8-w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

I asked this on the facebook group, thought I'd ask it here as well. Who
cannot be happy with vanilla's OSC support and still needs mrpeach and
stuff? I mean, really really need as in there's no way to deal with such
OSC tasks in Vanilla. Tell me what exactly please... I know that it can
happen and how, I just wanted examples in the real world, and I also
believe Vanilla is fine for most use cases.

I just never use OSC as all I do is inside Pd anyway :)

I see [netsend]/[netreceive] make [udpsend]/[udpreceive] obsolete these
days for OSC... but we also have [routeOSC] and [packOSC], and in Vanilla's
documentation we see this:  ~*no attempt is made here to clearly
distinguish between the OSC address (symbols) and the following data, nor
between blobs and lists of numbers - it is assumed that you know what types
the message should contain. You can alternatively use the OSC objects from
mrpeach which have more features than these.*~

cheers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20210418/c7ec61f9/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------