I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of
December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as
self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller
hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with
many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see
how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months,
including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I
want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor
boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to
interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of
0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I
wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be
to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for
HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of
December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self
made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller
hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with
many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic.
It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and
expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on
terrorism."
-
retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
Hey arduino folks,
I looked at the website, the HW looks very cute and promising, but I don't get the whole javaesque/proce55ing connection. Does the thing work on linux? I did not see any mention on the website... Why this java junk, did they write a interpreter in C that runs on the chip and executes that weirdo code? (which looks no easier than a good C API to me)
I think these chips have a full tool-chain for linux don't they?
At least processing finally has the source code available, they did not last time I checked.
oh well, I just think java is icky.
b.
On Wed, December 21, 2005 2:32 pm, Hans-Christoph Steiner said:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
You probably know this, but there is a new wiki site trying to gather all information about sensors and sound control. There is already a fair amount of references, lists of devices, and general sensor tutorial stuff: http://www.sensorwiki.org/ I guess discussion about sensor technology could be there as well since many questions are of a more general nature. You may also check out the european action Congas (Gesture controlled audio systems) http://www.cost287.org/ /anders
B. Bogart wrote:
Hey arduino folks,
I looked at the website, the HW looks very cute and promising, but I don't get the whole javaesque/proce55ing connection. Does the thing work on linux? I did not see any mention on the website... Why this java junk, did they write a interpreter in C that runs on the chip and executes that weirdo code? (which looks no easier than a good C API to me)
I think these chips have a full tool-chain for linux don't they?
At least processing finally has the source code available, they did not last time I checked.
oh well, I just think java is icky.
b.
On Wed, December 21, 2005 2:32 pm, Hans-Christoph Steiner said:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I have given workshops with the TELEO modules. A bit pricey but they are pretty indestructible. Even when you reverse plug the 24v output into the 5v output. Might get a bit of smoke and a bit of heat but it will still work afterwards. The major problem is that the screws are soooo tiny! (http://makingthings.com/)
My preference is now simple Microchips. Read "Physical computing" (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/159200346X/qid=1135271737/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs...) to get you started.
Just got some new chips and I will try to build the following super cheap interface: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/
Tom
On 12/22/05, B. Bogart ben@ekran.org wrote:
Hey arduino folks,
I looked at the website, the HW looks very cute and promising, but I don't get the whole javaesque/proce55ing connection. Does the thing work on linux? I did not see any mention on the website... Why this java junk, did they write a interpreter in C that runs on the chip and executes that weirdo code? (which looks no easier than a good C API to me)
I think these chips have a full tool-chain for linux don't they?
At least processing finally has the source code available, they did not last time I checked.
oh well, I just think java is icky.
b.
On Wed, December 21, 2005 2:32 pm, Hans-Christoph Steiner said:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Le 22 Décembre 2005 12:18, Thomas Ouellet Fredericks a écrit :
Just got some new chips and I will try to build the following super cheap interface: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/
This design is using the PIC18F4550, but there's also the PIC18F2550, which is similar (with more or less i/o ports). I have a PIC18F2550, and that should be possible to use it as well. Maybe Christian Klipper have an opinion. -- Marc
hi,
Am Donnerstag 22 Dezember 2005 19:23 schrieb Marc Lavallée:
Le 22 Décembre 2005 12:18, Thomas Ouellet Fredericks a écrit :
Just got some new chips and I will try to build the following super cheap interface: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/
This design is using the PIC18F4550, but there's also the PIC18F2550, which is similar (with more or less i/o ports). I have a PIC18F2550, and that should be possible to use it as well. Maybe Christian Klipper have an opinion. -- Marc
the 18f4550 is basically the same as the 18f2550. the 25 has only 28 pins, while the 45 has 40 pins. both have the same amount of memory, ram, etc. so, it should be possible to use the same code on that chip, you will just loose some i/o ports.
greets,
chris
Hi list,
Just wondering, I read the thread about the topic, but I am quite confused about the fact that nobody mentioned chips with TCP/IP layer. I would find useful, as Pd already has pre-built objects that can listen to TCP ports, to send Pd raw information about the sensors used, and then do anything you want with it. It is because it is not as cheap as other solutions ? Cause I find this solution pretty attractive. I am actually trying to set up a little project with students using this type of component to make them discover how to control sound with sensors. I know that it may sound to some people like the hammer to smash the fly (as we say in french), but as my lab can afford it ... Any comment welcome.
Sylvain
Marc Lavall?e say:
Le 22 D?cembre 2005 12:18, Thomas Ouellet Fredericks a ?crit?:
Just got some new chips and I will try to build the following super cheap interface: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/
just so you know , dan has made a new CUI with a pre-fabbed board. It is really compact at circa 1.5" x 4.5" with usb.
see this image: http://www.create.ucsb.edu/~dano/CUI/CUIv10small.jpg
Dan will even solder it all together for you and upload the initial firmware. all for about 50$.
all you need to do is solder on your analog and digital inputs and outputs, and then program the muthafucka.
-august.
-------------------
http://aug.ment.org
Le 22 Décembre 2005 14:11, Sylvain a écrit :
Hi list,
Just wondering, I read the thread about the topic, but I am quite confused about the fact that nobody mentioned chips with TCP/IP layer. I would find useful, as Pd already has pre-built objects that can listen to TCP ports, to send Pd raw information about the sensors used, and then do anything you want with it. It is because it is not as cheap as other solutions ? Cause I find this solution pretty attractive. I am actually trying to set up a little project with students using this type of component to make them discover how to control sound with sensors. I know that it may sound to some people like the hammer to smash the fly (as we say in french), but as my lab can afford it ... Any comment welcome.
I'm no aware of cheap enough microcontrollers with a TCP/IP stack. But since your "taylor is rich", here's at least two links: http://www.gumstix.com/products.html http://www.rabbitsemiconductor.com/products/rab2000_tcpip/ -- Marc
hi,
Am Donnerstag 22 Dezember 2005 20:11 schrieb Sylvain:
Hi list,
Just wondering, I read the thread about the topic, but I am quite confused about the fact that nobody mentioned chips with TCP/IP layer. I would find useful, as Pd already has pre-built objects that can listen to TCP ports, to send Pd raw information about the sensors used, and then do anything you want with it. It is because it is not as cheap as other solutions ? Cause I find this solution pretty attractive. I am actually trying to set up a little project with students using this type of component to make them discover how to control sound with sensors. I know that it may sound to some people like the hammer to smash the fly (as we say in french), but as my lab can afford it ... Any comment welcome.
Sylvain
the multio will get a 10baseT extension beginning of next year, so its on ethernet then.
but im not sure about the latency of that. it may be fine when there is nothing else is happening on that particular netsegment, we will see.
usb is pretty fast, available on almost any device nowdays, and allows for longer distances as well.
greets,
chris
hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability
of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am
testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board
sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches
for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches
on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we
basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually
David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in
Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to-
use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users
have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to
see how people are using various boards with Pd.I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months,
including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically,
I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for
sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions
to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point
range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping
objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the
grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects,
and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc..hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of
December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as
self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller
hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely
with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a
tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night
attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to
win the war on terrorism." -
retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
Hello Ben,
I think they are working on a linux version for Arduino, but I am
not really sure. There is a forum part at http://www.arduino.cc/
site, at least developers might give better answers to this linux
and java questions.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 22, 2005, at 6:26 PM, B. Bogart wrote:
Hey arduino folks,
I looked at the website, the HW looks very cute and promising, but
I don't get the whole javaesque/proce55ing connection. Does the thing work on linux? I did not see any mention on the website... Why this java
junk, did they write a interpreter in C that runs on the chip and executes that weirdo code? (which looks no easier than a good C API to me)I think these chips have a full tool-chain for linux don't they?
At least processing finally has the source code available, they did
not last time I checked.oh well, I just think java is icky.
b.
On Wed, December 21, 2005 2:32 pm, Hans-Christoph Steiner said:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for
sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan
will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess
for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc..hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as
self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the
war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Dec 22, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Christian Klippel wrote:
hi,
Am Donnerstag 22 Dezember 2005 20:11 schrieb Sylvain:
Hi list,
Just wondering, I read the thread about the topic, but I am quite confused about the fact that nobody mentioned chips with TCP/IP
layer. I would find useful, as Pd already has pre-built objects that can listen to TCP ports, to send Pd raw information about the sensors used, and then do anything you want with it. It is because it is not as cheap as other solutions ? Cause I find this solution pretty attractive. I am actually trying to set up a little project with students using this
type of component to make them discover how to control sound with sensors.
I know that it may sound to some people like the hammer to smash the fly (as we say in french), but as my lab can afford it ... Any comment welcome.Sylvain
the multio will get a 10baseT extension beginning of next year, so its
on ethernet then.but im not sure about the latency of that. it may be fine when there is nothing else is happening on that particular netsegment, we will see.
usb is pretty fast, available on almost any device nowdays, and allows
for longer distances as well.
According to spec, 10BaseT has a maximum cable length of 100m. USB 1.0
spec says 5m. I've used 100BaseT on cables well over 100m, so that
spec is quite conservative. I've heard about people having quite a few
troubles trying to get USB up to 20m.
Plus you can get a 300m spool of CAT5 for US$40. Ethernet is really
far better than USB if you want to go for long cable lengths.
.hc
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand
Le 23 Décembre 2005 14:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
According to spec, 10BaseT has a maximum cable length of 100m. USB 1.0 spec says 5m. I've used 100BaseT on cables well over 100m, so that spec is quite conservative. I've heard about people having quite a few troubles trying to get USB up to 20m.
Plus you can get a 300m spool of CAT5 for US$40. Ethernet is really far better than USB if you want to go for long cable lengths.
Here's a few USB extension solutions, but they are expensive: http://www.usbgear.com/USB-Extenders.html http://www.everythingusb.com/hardware/USB_distance_extension/ http://www.cablestogo.com/product.asp?cat_id=201&sku=29341 http://www.icron.com/products/usb/usb_products.php -- Marc
hi all,
Am Freitag 23 Dezember 2005 20:12 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner: [...snip...]
According to spec, 10BaseT has a maximum cable length of 100m. USB 1.0 spec says 5m. I've used 100BaseT on cables well over 100m, so that spec is quite conservative. I've heard about people having quite a few troubles trying to get USB up to 20m.
yes, its true that usb cant extend that long with just a cable, also, the maximum length is _very_ dependant on the connected device. here i have a 5 meter cable, no problems. also, usb hubs are really cheap.... but for sure, adding hubs adds latency as well .....
Plus you can get a 300m spool of CAT5 for US$40. Ethernet is really far better than USB if you want to go for long cable lengths.
thats right. im just curious about the latency i can get, but we will see....
.hc
greets,
chris
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand
oh,
and here are some cheaper, active usb cable extenders:
http://www.usbgear.com/USB2_extension_Cable/usb-extension-cable.html
greets,
chris
hello the arduino board works with linux, a friend of mine is using it. It took a bit of fiddling apparently but it did eventualy. antonios
Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
Hello Ben,
I think they are working on a linux version for Arduino, but I am not really sure. There is a forum part at http://www.arduino.cc/ site, at least developers might give better answers to this linux and java questions.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 22, 2005, at 6:26 PM, B. Bogart wrote:
Hey arduino folks,
I looked at the website, the HW looks very cute and promising, but I don't get the whole javaesque/proce55ing connection. Does the thing work on linux? I did not see any mention on the website... Why this java junk, did they write a interpreter in C that runs on the chip and executes that weirdo code? (which looks no easier than a good C API to me)
I think these chips have a full tool-chain for linux don't they?
At least processing finally has the source code available, they did not last time I checked.
oh well, I just think java is icky.
b.
On Wed, December 21, 2005 2:32 pm, Hans-Christoph Steiner said:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555_______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors (they
might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just
sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd
communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working
fine.
best,
Koray.

M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
_
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors (they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.
best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your
project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that
time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and developed
them further to use in my project.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors
(they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just
sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd
communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the
parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd
patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
_
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it
would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just started
making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people can write
more firmwares and still use the same objects in the host software.
A multiple ultrasound sensor would be a great first test of this
library, since it would only need to input data.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your
project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that
time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and
developed them further to use in my project.Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors
(they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just
sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd
communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the
parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd
patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the
stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final
patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy- to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X
users have problems with comport communication.Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level
abstractions
to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
__
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not
going to
win the war on terrorism."
retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of
exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an
idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into
the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess
himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
Well, we are going to be using multiple sensors, so I will let you know if this code works with them, once we get to that phase of the installation.
~Kyle
On 5/10/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just started making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people can write more firmwares and still use the same objects in the host software. A multiple ultrasound sensor would be a great first test of this library, since it would only need to input data.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote: Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and developed them further to use in my project.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors (they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.
best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
I think the ultrasonic sensors send serial bytevalues and not an analog value, correct? how can you connect them to the pduino? or how can you connect even more of them. can firmata handle serial inputs? marius.
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Well, we are going to be using multiple sensors, so I will let you know if this code works with them, once we get to that phase of the installation.
~Kyle
On 5/10/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just started making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people can write more firmwares and still use the same objects in the host software. A multiple ultrasound sensor would be a great first test of this library, since it would only need to input data.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote: Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and developed them further to use in my project.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors (they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.
best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
This firmware reads 2 ultrasound sensors at the same time, I guess it
might read more with a little adjustment in firmware. Firmata
Ultrasound firmware will be really great, I remember we had this
discussion earlier, and there was some sort of problem to code Pulse
in Pd_firmware.pde so that we could read ultrasound sensors through
[arduino] in PD. Looking forward to test this library!!!
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 11, 2007, at 1:54 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it
would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just
started making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people
can write more firmwares and still use the same objects in the host
software. A multiple ultrasound sensor would be a great first test
of this library, since it would only need to input data..hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your
project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that
time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and
developed them further to use in my project.Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library
either. This helps us out a TON!~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors
(they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just
sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd
communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the
parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd
patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the
stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final
patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which
actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make
easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X
users have problems with comport communication.Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox.
Basically,
I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit
for
sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level
abstractions
to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think
the
grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as
well as
self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote: > There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely > with many progs. >
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://
lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not
going to
win the war on terrorism."
retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others
of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power
called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long
as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces
itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot
dispossess himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
Yes, it seems better to code these microsecond pulses in the firmware rather than letting Pd control this directly. Maybe at audio signal rate this would be more satisfactory, I am not well-versed in this.
Our plan is to use 6 sensors, so we will attempt to modify the existing ultrasound firmware to this end. I see no reason why it would not work!
~Kyle
On 5/11/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote:
This firmware reads 2 ultrasound sensors at the same time, I guess it might read more with a little adjustment in firmware. Firmata Ultrasound firmware will be really great, I remember we had this discussion earlier, and there was some sort of problem to code Pulse in Pd_firmware.pde so that we could read ultrasound sensors through [arduino] in PD. Looking forward to test this library!!!
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 11, 2007, at 1:54 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just started making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people can write more firmwares and still use the same objects in the host software. A multiple ultrasound sensor would be a great first test of this library, since it would only need to input data.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote: Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and developed them further to use in my project.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors (they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.
best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy-to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
You would just send the data as an analog value, which gives you 14-
bits of resolution. In the Arduino firmware, it would just take the
values from the sensor and report them as a analog value using the
Firmata protocol. The [arduino] object already understands the
Firmata protocol, so it would just see the data as any other analog
message.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 10:38 PM, marius schebella wrote:
I think the ultrasonic sensors send serial bytevalues and not an
analog value, correct? how can you connect them to the pduino? or
how can you connect even more of them. can firmata handle serial
inputs? marius.Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Well, we are going to be using multiple sensors, so I will let you know if this code works with them, once we get to that phase of the installation. ~Kyle On 5/10/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it
would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just started
making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people can write more
firmwares and still use the same objects in the host software. A multiple
ultrasound sensor would be a great first test of this library, since it
would only need to input data..hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote: Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your
project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and developed them
further to use in my project.Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library
either. This helps us out a TON!~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors
(they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just
sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd
communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the
parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd
patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the
stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final
patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy- to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X
users have problems with comport communication.Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote:
There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely with many progs.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
__
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called
an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps
it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the
possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of
it. - Thomas Jefferson
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either
change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
Hmmm so is the size of the data chunk the issue here? It took some looking at the patch with some super arcane int to ascii to float wizardry to even read the values coming from one sensor.
Could you please elaborate on this? I _THINK_ that the firmware right now is using the digital connector to measure distance with the sensor by sending a short several-microsecond pulse, then switching to input mode and measuring the difference between pulse widths...I'm not a sonar expert so this is still a bit elusive to me. Does it have to do w/ the doppler effect in some way?
It is my understanding that this requires the digital in/out to work, but you are saying that I could do this with the analog instead? Am I right in guessing that the issue with more than 2 sensors on an arduino chip is the data "chunk" size, for lack of a better word, or do I need to find some (much welcomed if recommended by you experts out there) more physical computing background knowledge?
Thanks for saving me from an expensive electronics art master's degree program if you can provide some tutelage!
~Kyle
On 5/14/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
You would just send the data as an analog value, which gives you 14- bits of resolution. In the Arduino firmware, it would just take the values from the sensor and report them as a analog value using the Firmata protocol. The [arduino] object already understands the Firmata protocol, so it would just see the data as any other analog message.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 10:38 PM, marius schebella wrote:
I think the ultrasonic sensors send serial bytevalues and not an analog value, correct? how can you connect them to the pduino? or how can you connect even more of them. can firmata handle serial inputs? marius.
Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Well, we are going to be using multiple sensors, so I will let you know if this code works with them, once we get to that phase of the installation. ~Kyle On 5/10/07, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org wrote:
Does this firmware handle multiple ultrasound sensors? If so, it would awesome to make a Firmata Ultrasound firmware. I just started making the Firmata protocol into a library so that people can write more firmwares and still use the same objects in the host software. A multiple ultrasound sensor would be a great first test of this library, since it would only need to input data.
.hc
On May 10, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote: Hello Kyle,
I am glad that those patches worked and helped you out with your project. I guess big thanks goes to Hans for them, cos during that time, I just modified his existing multi-sensor patches and developed them further to use in my project.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 10, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Thanks so much Koray, it works great!
I see you used the same Arduino code for the sensor as I had found, and your Pd patch is very well-written and well-commented.
I appreciate this, because I did not want to try coding microsecond-level events in Pd by porting the Arduino code and using firmata, and I didn't want to use the SimpleMessaging library either. This helps us out a TON!
~Kyle
On 5/8/07, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: Hello Kyle,
Here I attach .pde files for arduino to read ultrasound sensors (they might have already there in the arduino sketchbook already, but just sending to be sure) and also modified Hans pd patches for arduino-pd communication. I didn't test them lately, but they used to be working fine.
best,
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab,UIAH http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ tel: +358 50 939 02 33 ( in Finland only) tel: +90 533 712 8245
On May 8, 2007, at 5:48 AM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Hi Koray~
I am working on a group project that involves Arduino and the parallax PING ultrasonic sensors. Would you be willing to share your Pd patches regarding this usage, as indicated in this email?
Thanks in advance!
~Kyle
On 12/22/05, Koray Tahiroglu ktahirog@uiah.fi wrote: hello Hans,
I made couple of test patches just to see the range and the stability of the values that I receive from sensors. At the moment, I am testing ultrasound sensor and also self made solar panel board sensor. After this weekend I will begin to construct my final patches for a gig that will be on 14th of January. I can upload the patches on PD site. During our Arduino+PD workshop two weeks ago, we basically started to develop your multi-sensor patch, which actually David had changed couple of things during a previous workshop in Vancouver. All in all i think it is such a nice idea to make easy- to- use framework for sensor boxes. Especially most of the Mac OS X users have problems with comport communication.
Koray.
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630 555
On Dec 21, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Do you have an patches that you are willing to share? I want to see how people are using various boards with Pd.
I will be working a lot with sensor boards in the coming months, including the Arduino, MultIO, and STEIM's junXionbox. Basically, I want to make an easy-to-use framework like the [hid] toolkit for sensor boxes. So basically, I'll be making high-level abstractions to interface these boxes which output data in a floating point range of 0-1. That means you can then use all of the mapping objects that I wrote for the [hid] toolkit. Actually, I think the grand plan will be to make a separate library of mapping objects, and then librariess for HIDs, sensor boxes, etc.
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Koray Tahiroglu wrote:
I've been using arduino with PD heavily since the beginning of December, I am happy with the ready sensor connections as well as self made sensors. And Arduino is an open source microcontroller hardware, http://www.arduino.cc/
cheers, Koray.
On Dec 20, 2005, at 7:55 PM, pd-list-request@iem.at wrote: > There are also the arduino and wiring boards that talk nicely > with many progs.
>
M.Koray Tahiroglu Media Lab, University of Art and Design Helsinki, TaiK Hameentie 135C 00560 Helsinki Finland http://mlab.uiah.fi/~korayt/ http://purenoise.uiah.fi:8000/ tel: +358 40 754 8449 fax: +358 9 75630
555_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
__
"Terrorism is not an enemy. It cannot be defeated. It's a tactic. It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and expect we're going to win that war. We're not going to win the war on terrorism." - retired U.S. Army general, William Odom
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
--
http://theradioproject.com http://perhapsidid.blogspot.com
(((())))(()()((((((((()())))()(((((((())()()())()))) (())))))(()))))))))))))(((((((((((()()))))))))((()))) ))(((((((((((())))())))))))))))))))__________ _____())))))(((((((((((((()))))))))))_______ ((((((())))))))))))((((((((000)))oOOOOOO
If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. - Thomas Jefferson
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
-
Anders Friberg -
antonios -
august -
B. Bogart -
Christian Klippel -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Koray Tahiroglu -
Kyle Klipowicz -
Marc Lavallée -
marius schebella -
Sylvain -
Thomas Ouellet Fredericks