Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd.
How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]?
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Christopher Meng empmeng@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm replying correctly to the list but anyway, I have one of these specifically for using with pd and it's really great. I waited and paid extra for the second version as it has some improved features. The programming interface is super flexible and the features are well thought out. I think you'd like this controller
Chris
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Jonghyun Kim agitato816@gmail.com wrote:
Hi list,
I think the SoftStep with Pd for live performance. Has anyone experienced the SoftStep with Pure Data?
It can be a good solution for live situation with Pd?
I think SoftStep one, not a 2nd edition. First edition is cheaper than 2nd.
http://www.keithmcmillen.com/softstep
Thanks, Jong
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd.
How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]?
[your OSC message( | [packOSC] | [udpsend]
pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux
Simon
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Simon Wise simonzwise@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd.
How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]?
[your OSC message( | [packOSC] | [udpsend]
You'll have to explicitly import the mrpeach library, use [import mrpeach]
pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux
Simon
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
On 08/03/14 21:13, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Simon Wisesimonzwise@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd.
How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]?
[your OSC message( | [packOSC] | [udpsend]
You'll have to explicitly import the mrpeach library, use [import mrpeach]
you are right, or use [osc/packOSC] and [iemnet/udpsend] for these ones ..
pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux
Simon
For OSC connection, you can also [netsend] with tcp, [netsend -u] with udp
My experience was [netsend] is a little better than others.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Simon Wise simonzwise@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 21:13, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Simon Wisesimonzwise@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/03/14 06:24, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
Thanks Chris for the answer! I was worried about compatibility with Pd.
How about OSC function with Pd? It's OSC works with [netsend] or [udpsend]?
[your OSC message( | [packOSC] | [udpsend]
You'll have to explicitly import the mrpeach library, use [import
mrpeach]
you are right, or use [osc/packOSC] and [iemnet/udpsend] for these ones ..
pd-osc: /usr/lib/pd/extra/osc/packOSC.pd_linux pd-iemnet: /usr/lib/pd/extra/iemnet/udpsend.pd_linux
Simon
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
On 09/03/14 02:58, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
For OSC connection, you can also [netsend] with tcp, [netsend -u] with udp
My experience was [netsend] is a little better than others.
Ok ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't investigate why but just used [udpsend] instead.
Simon
On Son, 2014-03-09 at 22:52 +1100, Simon Wise wrote:
On 09/03/14 02:58, Jonghyun Kim wrote:
For OSC connection, you can also [netsend] with tcp, [netsend -u] with udp
My experience was [netsend] is a little better than others.
Ok ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't investigate why but just used [udpsend] instead.
[netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255). [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend], but not [netsend].
Roman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2014-03-09 14:15, Roman Haefeli wrote:
k ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't investigate why but
just used [udpsend] instead.
[netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255). [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend], but not [netsend].
well, starting with Pd-0.45 [netsend] has support for binary data, which makes it compatible with [udpsend]. you have to pass it the "-b" switch though, so [udpsend] == [netsend -u -b] [tcpsend] == [netsend -b]
gfmdasr IOhannes
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:33 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2014-03-09 14:15, Roman Haefeli wrote:
k ... for me [packOSC] didn't work with [netsend], I didn't investigate why but
just used [udpsend] instead.
[netsend] is different from [udpsend] and [tcpsend] in that it sends incoming Pd (list/any) messages as FUDI. The latter two expect lists of bytes (list of numbers between 0 and 255). [packOSC] outputs OSC packets represented as lists of bytes and thus is designed to transported by either [udpsend] or [tcpsend], but not [netsend].
well, starting with Pd-0.45 [netsend] has support for binary data, which makes it compatible with [udpsend]. you have to pass it the "-b" switch though, so [udpsend] == [netsend -u -b] [tcpsend] == [netsend -b]
Oh, good to know. Thanks for the update.
Roman