hi everyone i am lookind for an object for PD that will work with uDMX from anyma i don´t know how to compile it i want to use in a windows machine
thanks bern
Hi Bern,
i compiled it but didnt test it since so you have to try it yourself - please reply your results. cheers georg
bernardo amorim schrieb:
hi everyone i am lookind for an object for PD that will work with uDMX from anyma i don´t know how to compile it i want to use in a windows machine
thanks bern
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Georg Werner wrote:
Hi Bern,
i compiled it but didnt test it since so you have to try it yourself - please reply your results. cheers georg
thanks for sharing these.
however due to loads of antivirus-software setup on various mailservers of people subscribed to this list, i now get a huge number of bounces since w32-executables/dlls will not be accepted. i suggest using one of the following:
- send .exe/.dll/.whatever packaged in a zip-file. this will save
bandwidth and usually will not be rejected by mailservers
- put downloadables on a website (e.g. http://puredata.info) where
people can download it. this will save even more bandwidth, as all linux/apple/solaris/dontknowwhat users probably don't want to have it anyhow.
a third option would obviously be to automatically store attachments at the list-server and add some links by the mailing-list software....(but that's work for me :-))
fgmasdr IOhannes
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
a third option would obviously be to automatically store attachments at the list-server and add some links by the mailing-list software....(but that's work for me :-))
after a tiny bit of going googling and looking at the mailman configu, i found that this is actually very simple, and only requires me to enable it with a single click.
the attachments would be inlined at the end of the emails like the following:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
but then i really think it is not such a bad idea to enable this feature. any other opinions?
Hm, would this mean that we would not get any attachements sent anymore, just links? That I wouldn't really like, as it make my personal list-archive depend on pd.info, which is not available everywhere I go.
Ciao
Frank
sorry but i don't seem to understand is there anyone going to help me on this problem? thank you
Yes agreed, I like having a "local copy" of the archive for those special times when the internet is far away. And the idea of having to manually rename every attachment isn't very cool either!!!!!! I see lots of complaints on the horizon for that. Imagine having a complicated patch with several abstractions that must be sorted and properly named in order for it to work.
D.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
but then i really think it is not such a bad idea to enable this feature. any other opinions?
Hm, would this mean that we would not get any attachements sent anymore, just links? That I wouldn't really like, as it make my personal list-archive depend on pd.info, which is not available everywhere I go.
Ciao
yes i agree also put the file on-line and off-line b
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Derek Holzer derek@umatic.nl wrote:
Yes agreed, I like having a "local copy" of the archive for those special times when the internet is far away. And the idea of having to manually rename every attachment isn't very cool either!!!!!! I see lots of complaints on the horizon for that. Imagine having a complicated patch with several abstractions that must be sorted and properly named in order for it to work.
D.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
but then i really think it is not such a bad idea to enable this feature.
any other opinions?
Hm, would this mean that we would not get any attachements sent anymore, just links? That I wouldn't really like, as it make my personal list-archive depend on pd.info, which is not available everywhere I go.
Ciao
-- ::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ::: http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista ::: ---Oblique Strategy # 99: "Is there something missing?"
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi georg i tried your dll and it seemed to work fine until i changed the number value on the right inlet it crashed pd in windows xp not on windows xp64bits i don't know why any clues?
thanks bern
hi bernardo,
i had the same problem. see http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2009-06/013765.html for the details and a link to the new uDMX.dll cheers Georg
bernardo amorim schrieb:
Hi georg i tried your dll and it seemed to work fine until i changed the number value on the right inlet it crashed pd in windows xp not on windows xp64bits i don't know why any clues?
thanks bern
-
bernardo amorim -
Derek Holzer -
Frank Barknecht -
Georg Werner -
IOhannes m zmoelnig