On Sep 22, 2023, at 11:04 AM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at wrote:

Cyrille,

thanks for your answer. I have not seen the sense to send a simple patch as it would not show the behaviour of the rendered Gem window under wsl2.

This isn't actually the point of sending a test patch... it's to help *other* people on *other systems* check that GEM itself is not broken *and* to double-check how you are using the objects & commands. Making a separate, minimal patch also isolates one problem form what could be other problems of usage, ie. layers of GL commands which might affect each other.

I agree with Cyril that a minimal patch would have been helpful. In any case, good luck.

Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/