What is the license for all the cyclone objects? Is it the same license for all of them?
One of the source files says to check LICENSE.txt for the distribution, which I think would be GPLv2, but then there's a LICENSE.txt in the "miXed" folder that looks like the revised BSD license.
Thanks, Jonathan
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 05:25:28PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
What is the license for all the cyclone objects? Is it the same license for all of them?
One of the source files says to check LICENSE.txt for the distribution, which I think would be GPLv2, but then there's a LICENSE.txt in the "miXed" folder that looks like the revised BSD license.
Cyclone itself has the Pd license, as it was meant to be easy to grab to include in vanilla.
Ciao
Frank
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
No problem, it is a common situation :D AFAIK Pd is in some kind of BSD license, i think a modified BSD, but not sure.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
What's the actual difference between GNU/GPL and BSD ????
On 14 June 2010 11:59, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
No problem, it is a common situation :D AFAIK Pd is in some kind of BSD license, i think a modified BSD, but not sure.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2
stuff in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its
GPLv3 as a whole pacakge.
.hc
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com
wrote: Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of
different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software,
doesn't it? http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you
are." - Linus Torvalds
Ok, so "Standard Improved BSD," or "SIBSD" seems to be the answer to my question.
Thanks, Jonathan
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at To: Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM Subject: Re: [PD] cyclone license
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2 stuff in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its GPLv3 as a whole pacakge.
.hc
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds
The difference it seems is that BSD allows proprietary use of the software. Right??
2010/6/20 Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com
Ok, so "Standard Improved BSD," or "SIBSD" seems to be the answer to my question.
Thanks, Jonathan
*From:* Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at *To:* Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com *Cc:* pd-list@iem.at *Sent:* Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM *Subject:* Re: [PD] cyclone license
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2 stuff in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its GPLv3 as a whole pacakge.
.hc
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds
Well, there is what Miller calls the "Standard Improved BSD," or SIBSD, which is generally referred to as the Modified BSD license to differentiate from the "original BSD" license: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses
The Modified BSD allows anyone to use the code in proprietary software.
But even with the GPL, the copyright holder can decide to sell
individual commercial licenses to a company to use the code in proprietary
software (The author of JUCE does this). There's a
video somewhere on the web of Richard Stallman being grilled about
about this practice, but his explanation of suggesting it to a company
to get them to release the code under the GPL in the first place
seems reasonable.
-Jonathan
From: Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com To: Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at; pd-list@iem.at Sent: Sun, June 20, 2010 11:56:59 AM Subject: Re: [PD] cyclone license
The difference it seems is that BSD allows proprietary use of the software. Right??
2010/6/20 Jonathan Wilkes jancsika@yahoo.com
Ok, so "Standard Improved BSD," or "SIBSD" seems to be the answer to my question.
Thanks, Jonathan
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
To: Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM Subject: Re: [PD] cyclone license
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2 stuff in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its GPLv3 as a whole pacakge.
.hc
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
I though PD was GNU/PGL
On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro ricardolameiro@gmail.com wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros bernardobarros2@gmail.com
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-- Fagote / Contrafagote Bassoon / Contra-bassoon http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds
-
Bernardo Barros -
Frank Barknecht -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
Jonathan Wilkes -
Ricardo Lameiro