The difference it seems is that BSD allows proprietary use of the software. Right??
Ok, so "Standard Improved BSD," or "SIBSD" seems to be the answer to my question.
Thanks,
Jonathan
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>
To: Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com>
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] cyclone license
The core of Pd from MIller is BSD. He distributes it with some GPLv2 stuff in it. Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its GPLv3 as a whole pacakge..hc
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:I though PD was GNU/PGLOn 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro <ricardolameiro@gmail.com> wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.
2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com>
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Fagote / Contrafagote
Bassoon / Contra-bassoon
http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
----------------------------------------------------------------------------"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds