The difference it seems is that BSD allows proprietary use of the software. Right??

2010/6/20 Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika@yahoo.com>
Ok, so "Standard Improved BSD," or "SIBSD" seems to be the answer to my question.

Thanks,
Jonathan


From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>
To: Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com>
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Mon, June 14, 2010 11:02:14 AM
Subject: Re: [PD] cyclone license


The core of Pd from MIller is BSD.  He distributes it with some GPLv2 stuff in it.  Pd-extended includes BSD, GPLv2 and GPLv3 code, so its GPLv3 as a whole pacakge.

.hc

On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:55 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:

I though PD was GNU/PGL

On 14 June 2010 11:53, Ricardo Lameiro <ricardolameiro@gmail.com> wrote:
Bernardo, BSD licens also is free software. There are a lot of different free software license. not only GPL, and Puredta is not GPL.

2010/6/14 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2@gmail.com>
I think it *have to be* GPL (v.3), since PD is free software, doesn't it?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




--
Fagote / Contrafagote
Bassoon / Contra-bassoon
http://myspace.com/ricardolameiro

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"A cellphone to me is just an opportunity to be irritated wherever you are." - Linus Torvalds