Hey all, I've enclosed a motionblur based patch I've been working on. For some odd reason [rotateXYZ] seems to be taking arguments for speed of rotation instead of an absolute position (when applied to a square containing pix_motionblur). Although I am basing that on the appearance of the blur. Any ideas what's going on, guys?
_________________________________________________________________
Tell us your greatest, weirdest and funniest Hotmail stories
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
hello,
the feedback is making this impression, but if you remove it, you'll see that rotate work like expected. c
Andrew Faraday a écrit :
Hey all, I've enclosed a motionblur based patch I've been working on. For some odd reason [rotateXYZ] seems to be taking arguments for speed of rotation instead of an absolute position (when applied to a square containing pix_motionblur). Although I am basing that on the appearance of the blur. Any ideas what's going on, guys?
We want to hear all your funny, exciting and crazy Hotmail stories. Tell us now http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/195013117/direct/01/
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Andrew Faraday -
cyrille henry