if you are using arch linux, write to console
yaourt -S pd-l2ork
it will do all job for you ;) fk.
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork? On Feb 5, 2013 3:01 PM, "Fero Kiraly" fero.kiraly@gmail.com wrote:
if you are using arch linux, write to console
yaourt -S pd-l2ork
it will do all job for you ;) fk.
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Ivica.. I don't have sucess...
I have only a little window of pd-l2ork with nothing..
I try for terminal and I have this: esteban@Tattoine:~/pd-l2ork-x86_64-20130126$ pd-l2ork error in file /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't find package tkpng while executing "package require tkpng" (file "/usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk" line 583) tcl: /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't open script
2013/2/5 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I'm in Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS amd64
2013/2/5 Esteban Viveros emviveros@gmail.com
Ivica.. I don't have sucess...
I have only a little window of pd-l2ork with nothing..
I try for terminal and I have this: esteban@Tattoine:~/pd-l2ork-x86_64-20130126$ pd-l2ork error in file /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't find package tkpng while executing "package require tkpng" (file "/usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk" line 583) tcl: /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't open script
2013/2/5 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Esteban Viveros
(27) 8815 7170 (27) 3066 0359 (11) 95761 4125 (11) 2738 7868
www.bandpage.com/estebanviveros http://soundcloud.com/estebanviveros
https://www.facebook.com/estebanviveros.art
You need tkpng package as indicated on the top of the website.
sudo apt-get install tkpng On Feb 5, 2013 5:44 PM, "Esteban Viveros" emviveros@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS amd64
2013/2/5 Esteban Viveros emviveros@gmail.com
Ivica.. I don't have sucess...
I have only a little window of pd-l2ork with nothing..
I try for terminal and I have this: esteban@Tattoine:~/pd-l2ork-x86_64-20130126$ pd-l2ork error in file /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't find package tkpng while executing "package require tkpng" (file "/usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk" line 583) tcl: /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't open script
2013/2/5 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working.
Can
you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Esteban Viveros
(27) 8815 7170 (27) 3066 0359 (11) 95761 4125 (11) 2738 7868
www.bandpage.com/estebanviveros http://soundcloud.com/estebanviveros
https://www.facebook.com/estebanviveros.art
--
Esteban Viveros
(27) 8815 7170 (27) 3066 0359 (11) 95761 4125 (11) 2738 7868
www.bandpage.com/estebanviveros http://soundcloud.com/estebanviveros
https://www.facebook.com/estebanviveros.art
Yes! Was only this... ;) Thanks a lot!
That's the end of carousel of pd installations in my ubuntu..
Pd-extended and Pd-L2ork like the end of musical I see today "Les Misérables" huehuehuehuehue
Sorry for Jokes...
2013/2/5 Ivica Bukvic ico@vt.edu
You need tkpng package as indicated on the top of the website.
sudo apt-get install tkpng On Feb 5, 2013 5:44 PM, "Esteban Viveros" emviveros@gmail.com wrote:
I'm in Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS amd64
2013/2/5 Esteban Viveros emviveros@gmail.com
Ivica.. I don't have sucess...
I have only a little window of pd-l2ork with nothing..
I try for terminal and I have this: esteban@Tattoine:~/pd-l2ork-x86_64-20130126$ pd-l2ork error in file /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't find package tkpng while executing "package require tkpng" (file "/usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk" line 583) tcl: /usr/local/lib/pd-l2ork/bin/pd.tk: can't open script
2013/2/5 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working.
Can
you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote: > Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between > pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
Esteban Viveros
(27) 8815 7170 (27) 3066 0359 (11) 95761 4125 (11) 2738 7868
www.bandpage.com/estebanviveros http://soundcloud.com/estebanviveros
https://www.facebook.com/estebanviveros.art
--
Esteban Viveros
(27) 8815 7170 (27) 3066 0359 (11) 95761 4125 (11) 2738 7868
www.bandpage.com/estebanviveros http://soundcloud.com/estebanviveros
https://www.facebook.com/estebanviveros.art
During build process, pd-l2ork gets it from:
git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem
Isn't this the most up-to-date version?
On 02/05/2013 04:59 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Yup, that's the one.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 07:04 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
During build process, pd-l2ork gets it from:
git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem
Isn't this the most up-to-date version?
On 02/05/2013 04:59 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
So, the question then is what is broken and what is the source of the problem... On Feb 5, 2013 8:40 PM, "Hans-Christoph Steiner" hans@at.or.at wrote:
Yup, that's the one.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 07:04 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
During build process, pd-l2ork gets it from:
git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem
Isn't this the most up-to-date version?
On 02/05/2013 04:59 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is
out of
date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its
the
last release version rather than the development version.
.hc
On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working.
Can
you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-05 22:52, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can
svn? Gem has switched to git in 2011. hopefully you meant "vcs" instead.
fgmasdr IOhannes
Hi,
thanks.
More specific:
all Gem objects were dashed. after adding "declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem" gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square.
Here's a bit of console output: gemreceive __gem_render $1 ... couldn't create gemreceive __gem_render_osd $1 ... couldn't create gemlist ... couldn't create GEMglColor4f 1 1 1 1 ... couldn't create GEMglMaterialfv GL_FRONT_AND_BACK GL_AMBIENT 0.2 0.2 0.2 1 ... couldn't create GEMglMaterialfv GL_FRONT_AND_BACK GL_DIFFUSE 0.8 0.8 0.8 1 ... couldn't create GEMglMaterialfv GL_FRONT_AND_BACK GL_EMISSION 0 0 0 1 ... couldn't create GEMglMaterialfv GL_FRONT_AND_BACK GL_SPECULAR 0 0 0 1 ... couldn't create GEMglMaterialfv GL_FRONT_AND_BACK GL_SHININESS 0 ... couldn't create GEMglPushMatrix color ... couldn't create
It's just maybe Gem is broken today. It's just maybe I did something wrong if it's working for you.
Thanks Charles
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can you be more specific? On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-06 09:54, Charles Goyard wrote:
Hi,
thanks.
More specific:
all Gem objects were dashed. after adding "declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem" gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square.
you need to _load_ Gem: [declare -lib Gem]
Here's a bit of console output: gemreceive __gem_render $1
i understand that you have not loaded Gem and only Gem's abstractions (found in /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem) are available. since there are abstraction implementations for [gemhead] and [gemwin] these objects succeed to create (though their internals that depend on the Gem-binary don't).
fgamsdr IOhannes
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
all Gem objects were dashed. after adding "declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem" gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square.
you need to _load_ Gem: [declare -lib Gem]
i understand that you have not loaded Gem and only Gem's abstractions (found in /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem) are available. since there are abstraction implementations for [gemhead] and [gemwin] these objects succeed to create (though their internals that depend on the Gem-binary don't).
Understood. It works !
thanks a lot.
Charles Goyard wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
all Gem objects were dashed. after adding "declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem" gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square.
you need to _load_ Gem: [declare -lib Gem]
i understand that you have not loaded Gem and only Gem's abstractions (found in /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem) are available. since there are abstraction implementations for [gemhead] and [gemwin] these objects succeed to create (though their internals that depend on the Gem-binary don't).
Understood. It works !
but Gem installation misses the *.so (video backends and stuff) in the installation dir.
once manually copied pix_video and pix_film work.
I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out.
Thanks for the all the hard work,
Charles
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote:
I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out.
Gem's "install script" (aka Makefile) installs everything, including all compiled backends. what makes you say that there is a bug here?
fgamsdr IOhannes
How did you install pd-l2ork? If you tried compiling it yourself and did not have all the development libraries necessary for compiling Gem, then the installer would never build Gem and give you plenty of errors. On the software page I provided a list of Ubuntu packages you would need to compile entire package successfully.
Pd-l2ork also comes with Gem being auto loaded when you start the app (using /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/default.pdl2ork), therefore it should just work if everything is been installed properly. Gem is built as a library and is located in /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem/Gem.pd_linux (or/usr/local... if you installed using script-based binary installer version).
Again, I need as much information as possible about how you installed the software. On Feb 6, 2013 8:26 AM, "Charles Goyard" cg@fsck.fr wrote:
Charles Goyard wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
all Gem objects were dashed. after adding "declare -path /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem" gemhead and gemwin objects are ok but not others such as color, rotate, square.
you need to _load_ Gem: [declare -lib Gem]
i understand that you have not loaded Gem and only Gem's abstractions (found in /usr/lib/pd-l2ork/extra/Gem) are available. since there are abstraction implementations for [gemhead] and [gemwin] these objects succeed to create (though their internals that depend on the Gem-binary don't).
Understood. It works !
but Gem installation misses the *.so (video backends and stuff) in the installation dir.
once manually copied pix_video and pix_film work.
I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out.
Thanks for the all the hard work,
Charles
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2013-02-06 14:20, Charles Goyard wrote:
I guess it's more a bug of Gem install script rather than pd-l2ork, but I just wanted to point that out.
Gem's "install script" (aka Makefile) installs everything, including all compiled backends. what makes you say that there is a bug here?
You're right. I tried from crash with Gem alone and everything is ok: make clean git pull aclocal ./autogen.sh # ^-- btw this two commands are missing from the readme.txt ./configure --with-pd=/opt/pd-vanilla-0.43/ --prefix=/opt/gem make sudo make install
When all goes smooth on first time, everything is ok. However, it seems that if something fails during compilation and you rerun make, then the .so files are not copied if they were produced by the former run of make. It already occured to me when building pd-extended a few months back. It can be a dependency problem in the various targets, a bug in make, something wrong with my system, a personal problem with my cat... Whatever the cause, I get a source directory with everything: sources, gem.pd_linux and *.so, and an install directory with everything but the *.so files (yes, the gem.pd_linux gets copied).
I'm not sure if it's a bug or a feature, so apologizes for using the wrong word. Maybe it's worth writing in the README.txt what a make clean can be necessary on some cases.
Ivica Bukvic wrote:
How did you install pd-l2ork?
From source with archlinux's PKGBUILD, with cwiid missing. So I first
ran a build, which failed, and then fixed the problem, rerun the build and got into the problems described above.
Again, I need as much information as possible about how you installed the software.
Well, I'll say the problem comes from make/fix/make. Obviously it's not that important at all. There is/was the same kind of problem in pd-extended with ln -s other existing symlimks that forces you to clean and rebuild everything (I reported that on sf) after hours of compilation just because a symlink exists. Annoying ain't it ?
Thank you all for your being patient :), and of course for your great software !
-
Charles Goyard -
Esteban Viveros -
Fero Kiraly -
Hans-Christoph Steiner -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Ivica Bukvic -
Ivica Ico Bukvic