On Feb 5, 2013 8:40 PM, "Hans-Christoph Steiner" <hans@at.or.at> wrote:

Yup, that's the one.

.hc

On 02/05/2013 07:04 PM, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> During build process, pd-l2ork gets it from:
>
> git://pd-gem.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/pd-gem/Gem
>
> Isn't this the most up-to-date version?
>
> On 02/05/2013 04:59 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> FYI, gem is no longer using svn, it switched to git. So Gem from SVN is out of
>> date, unless its from the pd-extended release branch, in which case its the
>> last release version rather than the development version.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On 02/05/2013 04:52 PM, Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>>> It is the latest Gem from svn, so I am not sure what is not working. Can
>>> you be more specific?
>>> On Feb 5, 2013 4:37 PM, "Charles Goyard" <cg@fsck.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, it conflics with pd-extended. (just tried).
>>>>
>>>> btw it's awesome. Too bad Gem seems to work badly, or is it just me ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ivica Bukvic wrote:
>>>>> Will it install in/usr/local, though, to prevent collision between
>>>>> pd-extended and pd-l2ork?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>