chris,

this (Mac OS X 10.4 i386http://downloads.sourceforge.net/pure-data/Pd-0.39.3-extended-macosx104-i386.dmg (Mac Pro, MacBook, all Intel Macs) [md5http://puredata.info/md5sum/Pd-0.39.3-extended-macosx104-i386.dmg.md5/at_download/file]) is the version i have been downloading from puredata.info also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, chris clepper cgclepper@gmail.com wrote:

You need x86 versions of your libraries. 0.38.4 probably ran entirely under Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native. Downloading full pd-extended for OSX Intel should get the right set.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney bfcarney@gmail.com wrote:

...

Hello there all Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?

All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version, I get this.

/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin, 10): no suitable image found. Did find: /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: mach-o, but wrong architecture fftease: can't load library iemabs: can't load library iemmatrix: can't load library liblist: can't load library PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 ( ydegoyon@free.fr )

I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no avail.

--

Ben C.

---

PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Ben Carney wrote:

chris, also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?

hey ben, fulfilling my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, I have to ask you; why don't you want to post also his private phone number, bank account, creditcard number, address, ssn? I think it is really bad style to post private information about other people on a public forum... marius.

marius, Beginning my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, you may be exaggerating a bit there. Yes, maybe in retrospect my question to C___ might have been better off left off of the public list. On the same token, your bashing me might have been better off meant for just me rather than make a spectacle of my error. Google anyone's name on this list and chances are you can find out a lot more about them than where they used to go to school, your name works well for this as well. Some might say that this message also should not appear on this list either. This is the last non pd related post I will make, believe me. I find this list a breath of fresh air and appreciate all who contribute very much. It is truly amazing that better support can come from an open-source tool than commercial software. It seems to me a somewhat tight and often friendly community and it might be great if it could also be used for networking. My message to Mr. C_____could be seen as one such attempt to say hello to people who might be in the C____ area.

C____ thank you for your response, it is not my intent to offend anyone.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chris clepper cgclepper@gmail.com wrote:

I wasn't dodging the question out of privacy, but rather to hide the shame of being affiliated with the place! The only contact I have with SAIC is sending Wafaa Bilal bail money. ;)

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:28 PM, marius schebella < marius.schebella@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Ben Carney wrote:

...

chris, also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?

hey ben, fulfilling my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, I have to ask you; why don't you want to post also his private phone number, bank account, creditcard number, address, ssn? I think it is really bad style to post private information about other people on a public forum... marius.