On Apr 7, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Ben Carney wrote:

chris,

this (Mac OS X 10.4 i386 (Mac Pro, MacBook, all Intel Macs) [md5]) is the version i have been downloading from puredata.info

also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, chris clepper <cgclepper@gmail.com> wrote:
You need x86 versions of your libraries. 0.38.4 probably ran entirely under Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native. Downloading full pd-extended for OSX Intel should get the right set.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <bfcarney@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello there all

Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?

All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version, I get this.

/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin, 10): no suitable image found. Did find:

/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin: mach-o, but wrong architecture
fftease: can't load library

iemabs: can't load library
iemmatrix: can't load library
liblist: can't load library
PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 ( ydegoyon@free.fr )

I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no avail.

--

Ben C.

_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

--

Ben C.
_______________________________________________
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list