Pd-list January 2017

pd-list@lists.iem.at

63 participants
84 discussions

32 and 64 bits in parallel
by Jma/celeonet 14 Jan '17

14 Jan '17

Sorry to post this again, not sure it went through the first time What's the way to have two instances of pd, 32 bits (for GEM) and 64 bits (for ram) running in parallel with different binaries / libraries and prefs (OSX) ? 1- Where is the smart place for externals / libraries so that they do not conflict : is it possible to stick them anywhere, has it to be in /Lib/Pd or can they be in the application packet for the 64bits the old way ? (I'm looking for the professional way before hacking around) 2- Is there a way to have specific prefs for the 64bits in the default file inside app packet, and no prefs in the /Usr/Library/Préférences ? (Same note). Tks JmAdrien

2 1

standalone with preferences included on OSX?
by enrike 14 Jan '17

14 Jan '17

hi I would like to have a version of PD with a set of externals and to be able to pass that app to some students not needing to set the preferences to load the externals in every machine (neither copy the preferences file). I want it to be 100% portable. I was reading this old post about something similar https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-10/065691.html Is it possible to achieve this nowadays? thanks enrike

5 12

Re: [PD] PD hangs when opening a sub-patch that expects creation argument
by David 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

I'll try to come up with a minimal example. Normally, I can open an abstraction directly, as you say. But in this case, I can't. It's a rather complicated patch, though, so I'm not sure what the problem is. As for your other question, I tried installing 0.47.1 several months ago, but ran into other problems related to some external libraries I was using, so I reverted back to 0.46.7. Maybe I'll install it again, and see if it hangs as well when I try to open this patch. Thanks, David. > On 01/12/2017 05:03 PM, David wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is a "bug" or if it's normal, but when I try to > open a > > sub-patch (an abstraction) with "File/Open" that expects creation > > arguments, > > unable to reproduce. > i do this all the time. > > if you don't supply arguments, Pd fills in some defaults. > so the only thing i can think of where a hang might happen, is that the > default arguments trigger an infinite loop. > > of course it would help if you could provide a minimal abstraction that > shows the problem. > > > PD (Pd 0.46.7) hangs > > while I'm pretty sure that this won't help you with the problem at hand: > is there any specific reason to not use the most current stable release > of Pd? (currently 0.47-1). > > gfmrdsa > IOhannes > >

1 0

Re: [PD] abstractions with arguments
by jlistshit 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

Thank you, João. Yes, i noticed, that a simple [loadbang] | [float $0] | [outlet] inside the abstraction does that trick. jayrope - - - www.jayrope.com www.aircushionfinish.com www.ello.co/jayrope On 13 Jan 2017, at 16:11, pd-list-request(a)lists.iem.at wrote: > also notice, you can use $0 as an argument (very useful when assuring > individuality of variables, and still connect them to the parent patch)

1 0

New Blankets Pd related netcasts on January 15 and January 16
by Joe Deken 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

You may listen to these two Pd netcasts from New Blankets (on their respective "broadcast days") at: http://newblankets.org (If you e-mail calendar(a)newblankets.org and pledge a contribution for our New Blankets Pd-activities on those days, there are matching funds to boost your contribution. Details are at the page. I'll be happy to answer any questions on the list or via personal e-mail. If you'd like to send your own sound-commentary or your music or pd-works etc ... You're invited to do that (as an e-mail .mp3 attachment) to feedback(a)newblankets.org Thanks!

1 0

(no subject)
by Joe Deken 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

1 0

Re: [PD] abstractions with arguments
by jlistshit 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

Thank you for the hint, Johannes. I found (for me) more understandable info here as well: http://msp.ucsd.edu/techniques/v0.11/book-html/node67.html I learned how to do this now. On 12 Jan 2017, at 12:00, pd-list-request(a)lists.iem.at wrote: > On 2017-01-12 02:01, jlistshit wrote: >> Forgive me, if this has been asked before: >> Is there a way to insert arguments into an object box when loading an abstraction, so that the abstraction would receive it’s respective default values from those arguments? >> > > as in manual §2.7.1 and doc/2.control/13.locality.pd? > > > fgdasmr > IOhannes jayrope - - - www.jayrope.com www.aircushionfinish.com www.ello.co/jayrope

1 0

abstractions with arguments
by jlistshit 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

Forgive me, if this has been asked before: Is there a way to insert arguments into an object box when loading an abstraction, so that the abstraction would receive it’s respective default values from those arguments? an example [jrp-adsr 0 60 0.1 1200] thanx you for any insights! +++ jayrope - - - www.jayrope.com www.aircushionfinish.com www.ello.co/jayrope

3 2

NAMM?
by Peter Nyboer 13 Jan '17

13 Jan '17

Sorry, kinda ot but wondering who might be at that big weird convention hall next week. PD meetup? Peter Nyboer > On Jan 12, 2017, at 7:35 PM, pd-list-request(a)lists.iem.at wrote: > > Send Pd-list mailing list submissions to > pd-list(a)lists.iem.at > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > pd-list-request(a)lists.iem.at > > You can reach the person managing the list at > pd-list-owner(a)lists.iem.at > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Pd-list digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Purr Data rc4 (Jonathan Wilkes) > 2. Re: Purr Data rc4 (Lucas Cordiviola) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 03:17:32 +0000 (UTC) > From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika(a)yahoo.com> > To: Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27(a)hotmail.com>, Alexandre Torres Porres > <porres(a)gmail.com>, "pd-list(a)lists.iem.at" <pd-list(a)lists.iem.at> > Subject: Re: [PD] Purr Data rc4 > Message-ID: <1822498293.2395604.1484277452355(a)mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >> I think I will spend some time trying to build it for myself and learn what I can along the way. > > > It shouldn't take that long to start the build-- somewhere between 10-20 minutes > depending on your internet connection. Once you start the build process the > rest is automatic. If anything weird happens you can just uninstall msys2-- no > state should be left on your machine at that point. > -Jonathan > >> Also I might ask for a couple of questions. >> But this is not my top priority at the moment. >> Salutti,> Lucarda. > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. > > From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika(a)yahoo.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 11:01 PM > To: Lucas Cordiviola; Alexandre Torres Porres; pd-list(a)lists.iem.at > Subject: Re: [PD] Purr Data rc4 > > > >> In fact if you want to go that route, you can just install msys2 and ignore the instructions to install inno setup. The tar_em_up.sh script will ultimately fail, but you should still end up with everything inside the build/ directory. > > >> To cut it short: >> Can you supply that “build dir” Zipped for us to test RC4, RC5 and so on? > Unfortunately I don't own a Windows machine, nor do I have arbitrary access > to one to do this. > But if someone who has Pd-extended installed will test installing and then > uninstalling Purr Data, that would be enough to confirm or allay your fear. > > -Jonathan > > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. > > > > >

1 0

PD hangs when opening a sub-patch that expects creation arguments
by David 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

I'm not sure if this is a "bug" or if it's normal, but when I try to open a sub-patch (an abstraction) with "File/Open" that expects creation arguments, PD (Pd 0.46.7) hangs and I have to kill it with Task Manager (I'm running under Windows 7). But if I open a patch that uses the sub-patch, I can right-click on the object and select "Open", and it opens without any problem. The sub-patch seems to work correctly, too. I just can't open it from the "File" menu. Is this normal? Thanks, David.

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

Pd-list January 2017