New subject: Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080221-macosx104-i386.dmg

24 Feb 2008

      Hey,
I think this is of general interest and useful to have in the

archives, so I am cc'ing the list.
The unstable stuff can be a little dodgy, but if the only thing

that's missing is libsndfile1, I think everything should build ok.

AFAIK, [sndfiler] and/or [readanysf~] are not automatically included

in the build, and they are the only ones that need libsndfile1.
As for the Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080221-macosx104-i386.dmg, I built

that on my laptop, which is running 10.4.11.
.hc
On Feb 23, 2008, at 5:33 PM, Brandon Zeeb wrote:
...
Excellent.
However, I can't get passed the last few "unstable" dependencies, I

ALWAYS get this error:
Failed: Internal error: node for ptex-nox-base already exists
This must be a Fink issue on 10.5, I've tried using other packages

(ie: tetex-nox-base) but get the same error. I've been working on

this all week, anybody have a better experience?
The following dependencies are in the "stable" group for 10.5:
flac flac-shlibs libsndfile1 libsndfile1-shlibs libogg libogg- 
shlibs libvorbis0 libvorbis0-shlibs libtiff libtiff-shlibs graphviz

pcre pcre-shlibs lua51 lua51-dev ladspa ladspa-dev lame-dev lame- 
shlibs
(Note: libsndfile1 above is the only dependency which won't compile

as "unstable")
The following are "unstable":
fftw3 fftw3-shlibs liblo0 liblo0-shlibs  ffmpeg ffmpeg-dev

libavcodec1-dev libavcodec1-shlibs libdv4 libdv4-shlibs speex3

speex3-shlibs
One of two scenarios always occur:

I can build all the dependencies as "unstable", and not get the

error above, but then libsndfile1 won't compile.
2. Failed: Internal error: node for ptex-nox-base already exists
Maybe there is a secret combination of steps one could take to get

the full kit to build, but I haven't found it yet.  I'm running

Fink 0.28.11, which you can get from Fink's sourceforge page.'
Hans, did you build the Pd-extended below on 10.4?
Cheers,
~brandon
On Feb 23, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
...
8.4.18.
You can use [tcl_version] to find out what version is being used.
.hc
On Feb 22, 2008, at 7:29 PM, bsoisoi wrote:
...
Sweet! Thanks again, Hans!
Is this build compiled against Tcl/Tk 8.4.10?
~bsoisoi
On Feb 22, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
...
I created another one, since I was using the old Tcl/Tk which

causes
crashed on Leopard.  Also, the rsync wasn't automatically updating
for the autobuilds, so this should have the changes from the past
week:
http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/2008-02-22/Pd-0.40.3-
extended-20080222-macosx104-i386.dmg
Soon, we hope to have Leopard builds, thanks to bsoisoi! :)
.hc
On Feb 22, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Jack wrote:
...
Excellent for Intel users !
++
Jack
Le 22 févr. 08 à 05:36, Hans-Christoph Steiner a écrit :
...
I manually built on Mac OS X/Intel if anyone is interested:
http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/2008-02-21/Pd-0.40.3-
extended-20080221-macosx104-i386.dmg
.hc

                                         http://at.or.at/ 

hans/

PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/
listinfo/pd-list

All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies,
one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a

better
language; and every chapter must be so translated.... -John Donne

PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list

PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list

If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick.    - 
David Zicarelli

Re: [PD] Pd-0.40.3-extended-20080221-macosx104-i386.dmg