Dear list,
can anyone confirm if the size argument works in the image-help.pd? I am trying to create an interface, where the image which is shown in GEM as well visible in the interface itself in a reduced size. Unfortunately, I have not managed yet the scale message to be working. The 'image' object is in Tcl/tk.
Thanks in advance for any hints:
Popesz
On 2015-09-02 16:04, Csaba Láng wrote:
Dear list,
can anyone confirm if the size argument works in the image-help.pd? I am trying to create an interface, where the image which is shown in GEM as well visible in the interface itself in a reduced size. Unfortunately, I have not managed yet the scale message to be working. The 'image' object is in Tcl/tk.
afaik, tcl/tk only allows integer scaling. could that be the problem?
fgmasdr IOhannes
Iohannes, what does it mean for me? What should be the message then? Popesz
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2015-09-02 16:04, Csaba Láng wrote:
Dear list,
can anyone confirm if the size argument works in the image-help.pd? I am trying to create an interface, where the image which is shown in GEM as well visible in the interface itself in a reduced size. Unfortunately, I have not managed yet the scale message to be working. The 'image' object is in Tcl/tk.
afaik, tcl/tk only allows integer scaling. could that be the problem?
fgmasdr IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
If I send [size 0.1 0.1( before opening a file, it does not matter, the size remains the original.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Csaba Láng langcsaba@gmail.com wrote:
Iohannes, what does it mean for me? What should be the message then? Popesz
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2015-09-02 16:04, Csaba Láng wrote:
Dear list,
can anyone confirm if the size argument works in the image-help.pd? I am trying to create an interface, where the image which is shown in
GEM
as well visible in the interface itself in a reduced size. Unfortunately, I have not managed yet the scale message to be working. The 'image' object is in Tcl/tk.
afaik, tcl/tk only allows integer scaling. could that be the problem?
fgmasdr IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
Iohannes, no difference, tried size 2 2 and size 4 4, the size the same. I have a file 200x200 gif and the size both way the same. I attach my test image just in case. Cheers: Popesz
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 09/02/2015 07:33 PM, Csaba Láng wrote:
If I send [size 0.1 0.1( before opening a file, it does not matter, the size remains the original.
since "0.1" is definitely not an integer, try something lke [size 2 2(.
fgmrdsa IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Dear list, Can anyone confirm if the image object works with the size message?
Thanks.
On Wednesday, September 2, 2015, Csaba Láng langcsaba@gmail.com wrote:
Iohannes, no difference, tried size 2 2 and size 4 4, the size the same. I have a file 200x200 gif and the size both way the same. I attach my test image just in case. Cheers: Popesz On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 9:58 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at
wrote:
On 09/02/2015 07:33 PM, Csaba Láng wrote:
If I send [size 0.1 0.1( before opening a file, it does not matter, the size remains the original.
since "0.1" is definitely not an integer, try something lke [size 2 2(.
fgmrdsa IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
The one made by Guenter Geiger.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:05 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2015-09-07 10:22, Csaba Láng wrote:
Dear list, Can anyone confirm if the image object works with the size message?
as there are multiple [image] objects in the svn: which one are you referring to?
fgam IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 2015-09-07 11:52, Csaba Láng wrote:
The one made by Guenter Geiger.
afaict (after looking at the code and verifying with the help-patch), the "size" message only changes the *active* rectangle (that allows you to select the object), rather than the image itself. so yes, i can confirm your observation.
i also did a quick check on the documentation [1] and toyed with the code, and find that indeed the best you can get with re-scaling is integer factors (e.g. triple width and half height; but not so easy to make a 800x600 image fit into a 720x540 canvas)
fgm,asdr IOhannes
-
Csaba Láng -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
IOhannes m zmölnig