Could anyone explain me what "Pure Data" stands for? Is it possible to actually compose music with PD? In which way are complex scores handled by PD? Why NN is against PD? Excuse me for the trivial questions, but I'm really new.
Gabriel Maldonado writes:
Could anyone explain me what "Pure Data" stands for?
Pure Data means, that the original "MIDI Data" centered approach of MAX is extended by using additional other data types. Its an object oriented approach, which means that a "pure datum" is handled as an data object within pd.
This new approach isn't explored to widely yet, so most users will program in the normal "MAX" way, which means by using symbols, float and list types for most data manipulation.
Is it possible to actually compose music with PD? In which way are complex scores handled by PD?
The paradigm of MAX is rather different from the common score centered approach Csound takes. It's more an algorithm based approach, although it is definitely possible to build an algorithm which uses a score file. The qlist object provides facilites for that.
Additionally it is always realtime, which means if your computer is too slow, you have to split your piece into different tracks and produce them separately.
PD is very well suited for building programs for interactive installations, life performances and the like, if you want to do score editing you are probably better off with Csound.
Because of it's realtime ability pd lacks dynamic voice instantiation for instruments, so you have to build your instruments to always contain the number of voices you want to play at the same time.
Why NN is against PD?
Who/what is NN ? Why should anyone be against PD ?
Guenter
Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
Could anyone explain me what "Pure Data" stands for? Is it possible to actually compose music with PD? In which way are complex scores handled by PD? Why NN is against PD? Excuse me for the trivial questions, but I'm really new.
-- Gabriel Maldonado
PD? Communication between datas? It is possible to make la musique with PD. There a no concepts of sco or orc, in PD, but it is possible to make it run in the way you want. PD is interaction between objects (audio or data objects).
NN position is soupe-version, just warning of "l'eugenisme artisticotechnologique", really good point of view... anyway I believe in OpenSource, and therefore I hope every objects programmed in the future for PD should be released in GPL : Miller should change the license in this way.
Cld
Claude Le Berre wrote:
point of view... anyway I believe in OpenSource, and therefore I hope every objects programmed in the future for PD should be released in GPL : Miller should change the license in this way.
Isn't PD GPL copyrighted now?
Gabriel Maldonado wrote:
Claude Le Berre wrote:
point of view... anyway I believe in OpenSource, and therefore I hope every objects programmed in the future for PD should be released in GPL : Miller should change the license in this way.
Isn't PD GPL copyrighted now?
-- Gabriel Maldonado
Seems to be not so far from GPL, but I would like particularly to see a notice about open source code, that would make it really GPL. It will be particularly important for objects, since I would'nt find so cool to see people developping not free objects like for MAX (MSP/Nato), ok it is work, but it also also be life forms expansion. For example, NN do surely a great work, but I don't see the impact in a long term (pl!z korrekt m3 !f 50)... (transfatal incorporated.)
opensource is a virus, the virus ov openness.
Cld.