I made a loadbang object last night...seems to be working fine. You
...
But there's a loadbang already in the distribution. Only thing is, I think there's a problem putting loadbangs in abstractions which I was wanting to get around to fixing. I never bothered with closebang either, although if there's a need for it I probably should include it.
Anyway, take loadbang with a grain of salt for now...
As to sequencing (re Larry Troxler), I think I'm going to have to put a qlist-compatible object in Pd because the whole IRCAM FTS repertory uses it. I was just thinking about whether I could afford to put that off another week or whether it's needed right away...
-Miller
Oops. And to think that I posted an object list the other day...sigh.
Later, Mark
Miller Puckette wrote:
But there's a loadbang already in the distribution. Only thing is, I think