Hi list,
I am trying to use the ssr-Objects from https://github.com/SoundScapeRenderer/ssr/tree/master/flext which are compiled using flext.
When initiating these objects, the Pd console prints Bad arguments for message 'loadbang' to object 'ssr_binaural~' (or analogous for all other objects in that library)
There is no other object or message connected to the inlet, nor does this behavior change when pd is started with the -noloadbang option.
Does anyone know what could cause this?
thx P
- Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com [2015-06-10 11:41]:
Hi list,
I am trying to use the ssr-Objects from https://github.com/SoundScapeRenderer/ssr/tree/master/flext which are compiled using flext.
When initiating these objects, the Pd console prints Bad arguments for message 'loadbang' to object 'ssr_binaural~' (or analogous for all other objects in that library)
There is no other object or message connected to the inlet, nor does this behavior change when pd is started with the -noloadbang option.
Does anyone know what could cause this?
thx P
(follow-up to myself)
This happens with Pd 0.46 but not on 0.43(extended). Perhaps something has changed between these two versions?
There is a thread on the flext mailing list which seems to be related: http://grrrr.org/pipermail/flext/2015-January/000505.html
thx P
On 06/11/2015 06:13 PM, Peter P. wrote:
This happens with Pd 0.46 but not on 0.43(extended). Perhaps something has changed between these two versions?
i don't think that much has changed on the [loadbang] side between Pd-0.43 and Pd-0.46. however, Pd-extended included a number of changes with resp. to Pd-vanilla. and i know that the [loadbang]s are different in the two version: e.g. the PdX one has an inlet.
There is a thread on the flext mailing list which seems to be related: http://grrrr.org/pipermail/flext/2015-January/000505.html
did you compile/link both flext and the externals against Pd-vanilla or Pd-extended?
fasmrd IOhannes
Hi,
- IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at [2015-06-11 13:59]:
On 06/11/2015 06:13 PM, Peter P. wrote:
This happens with Pd 0.46 but not on 0.43(extended). Perhaps something has changed between these two versions?
i don't think that much has changed on the [loadbang] side between Pd-0.43 and Pd-0.46. however, Pd-extended included a number of changes with resp. to Pd-vanilla. and i know that the [loadbang]s are different in the two version: e.g. the PdX one has an inlet.
Oh, this error is not related to the [loadbang] object, but something that happens inside the object when it is created.
There is a thread on the flext mailing list which seems to be related: http://grrrr.org/pipermail/flext/2015-January/000505.html
did you compile/link both flext and the externals against Pd-vanilla or Pd-extended?
Both were compiled against Pd-vanilla. Or I am not sure, as my Pd-vanilla comes from Miller's git, the externals from an svn checkout of the entire pd tree, which includes sources as well. Would that be a problem?
On 06/11/2015 08:08 PM, Peter P. wrote:
Both were compiled against Pd-vanilla. Or I am not sure, as my Pd-vanilla comes from Miller's git, the externals from an svn checkout of the entire pd tree, which includes sources as well. Would that be a problem?
might be. i would replace trunk/pd with the git checkout from miller.
gfmasdr IOhannes
Hi,
- IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at [2015-06-11 14:18]:
On 06/11/2015 08:08 PM, Peter P. wrote:
Both were compiled against Pd-vanilla. Or I am not sure, as my Pd-vanilla comes from Miller's git, the externals from an svn checkout of the entire pd tree, which includes sources as well. Would that be a problem?
might be. i would replace trunk/pd with the git checkout from miller.
Can I add as question: Why are these older Pd sources in the svn (src/Changelog says 0.42.0)? Are they used to compile extended? Could I do without them?
After running svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/pure-data/svn/trunk pure-data-svn I see that svn has downloaded the following directories:
"abstractions debian doc extensions externals guiplugins packages pd scripts"
I am wondering how could I tell the svn command to only fetch
"abstractions doc externals"?
and add miller's git as "src" directory via eg. a symlink.
thanks for any ideas!
Am 12. Juni 2015 19:04:21 MESZ, schrieb "Peter P." peterparker@fastmail.com:
Can I add as question: Why are these older Pd sources in the svn (src/Changelog says 0.42.0)?
Because someone put it there :-) More serious: in the olde days, that was the place where official pd development happened. And nobody removed it.
Are they used to compile extended?
afaik, a lot of externals use the bundled pd as default header source. Many will also search "standard" directories (/usr/include/pd), if the system has the concept of standard include directories (such as linux, bur not w32)
Could I do without them?
maybe. Try it and tell us
After running svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/pure-data/svn/trunk pure-data-svn I see that svn has downloaded the following directories:
"abstractions debian doc extensions externals guiplugins packages pd scripts"
I am wondering how could I tell the svn command to only fetch
"abstractions doc externals"?
$ for d in abstractions doc externals do svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/pure-data/svn/trunk/$d done
and add miller's git as "src" directory via eg. a symlink.
why "src"? Should be "pd". $ git clone git://...../pure-data pd
mfg.ugd.fhj IOhannes
-- Sent from my pdp-11
Hi all, i am aware of that issue but haven’t had the time to really debug the code. It would be great if you could add your observations to https://github.com/grrrr/flext/issues/9 Obviously, apart from the error message, nothing bad happens. best, Thomas
Am 11.06.2015 um 18:13 schrieb Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com:
- Peter P. peterparker@fastmail.com [2015-06-10 11:41]:
Hi list,
I am trying to use the ssr-Objects from https://github.com/SoundScapeRenderer/ssr/tree/master/flext which are compiled using flext.
When initiating these objects, the Pd console prints Bad arguments for message 'loadbang' to object 'ssr_binaural~' (or analogous for all other objects in that library)
There is no other object or message connected to the inlet, nor does this behavior change when pd is started with the -noloadbang option.
Does anyone know what could cause this?
thx P
(follow-up to myself)
This happens with Pd 0.46 but not on 0.43(extended). Perhaps something has changed between these two versions?
There is a thread on the flext mailing list which seems to be related: http://grrrr.org/pipermail/flext/2015-January/000505.html
thx P
-
IOhannes m zmölnig -
IOhannes zmölnig
-
Peter P. -
Thomas Grill