Hi,
I'm trying
[pix_set 8 8] | [pix_crop]
and whatever width, height and offset I give pix_crop it doesn't crop at all.
Am I missing something, is it a bug, or is pix_crop meant to work only with image and video data (such as coming from pix_video, pix_film, pix_image etc)?
thanks m.
On 18/08/10 16:15, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying
[pix_set 8 8] | [pix_crop]
and whatever width, height and offset I give pix_crop it doesn't crop at all.
It works here, see attached (requires gridflow as well as Gem as I didn't feel like writing a long list in the patch).
Versions:
claude@zebimus:~$ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS" claude@zebimus:~$ uname -a Linux zebimus 2.6.32-24-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 05:14:15 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux claude@zebimus:~$ apt-cache policy puredata gem gridflow puredata: Installed: 0.42.5-3 Candidate: 0.42.5-3 Version table: *** 0.42.5-3 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status gem: Installed: 1:0.92.2-2 Candidate: 1:0.92.2-2 Version table: *** 1:0.92.2-2 0 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status gridflow: Installed: 9.10-1~ppa1~lucid3 Candidate: 9.10-1~ppa1~lucid3 Version table: *** 9.10-1~ppa1~lucid3 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/claudiusmaximus/ppa/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/puredyne-team/ppa/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
On 08/18/2010 05:42 PM, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
It works here, see attached (requires gridflow as well as Gem as I didn't feel like writing a long list in the patch).
Ok, I see. The problem is that when [pix_crop] receives a new value for any of the width, height, offsetx or offsety parameters, it does not update the output until you resend the list to [pix_set]. See attached patch
Unless you put a pix_separator on it.
Now that I think about it, I remember the same happening with pix_image and/or with pix_film when the frame didn't change, but now I can't reproduce that except with pix_set.
Maybe it was fixed for pix_image and pix_video, or that is specific to Windows...
Thank you m.