Has anyone experienced any buggy behavior by setting lots of outlets and inlets to a [mtx_*~]? I'm designing some hardware that will be using this object and the prototype, on a breadboard, behaves fine with 16 outlets and 16 inlets. Haven't tried more than that yet as it is quite cumbersome on a breadboard, so thought of asking if anyone knows of any limitations of this object.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2013-11-19 13:58, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Has anyone experienced any buggy behavior by setting lots of outlets and inlets to a [mtx_*~]? I'm designing some hardware that will be using this object and the prototype, on a breadboard, behaves fine with 16 outlets and 16 inlets. Haven't tried more than that yet as it is quite cumbersome on a breadboard, so thought of asking if anyone knows of any limitations of this object.
the sky (and your processing power) is the limit.
fmgadr IOhannes
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.atwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2013-11-19 13:58, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Has anyone experienced any buggy behavior by setting lots of outlets and inlets to a [mtx_*~]? I'm designing some hardware that will be using this object and the prototype, on a breadboard, behaves fine with 16 outlets and 16 inlets. Haven't tried more than that yet as it is quite cumbersome on a breadboard, so thought of asking if anyone knows of any limitations of this object.
the sky (and your processing power) is the limit.
Good to know! Thanks.
fmgadr IOhannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSi2j/AAoJELZQGcR/ejb4TtwP/2+TOsqK8f79of/3+saUiLTr wTQW7IOgVUq0Jaukf/2y//JPuxpb0wuRrpMIGQcecz4eiRS+bxE/shQ+IXENfGmw F8cQdXFiAStPdS9PkTI+I8Sc9bAuKt6ogUgM5LwDhfHHQG8KZNQxbt3gXXuiWQu7 QvQwdMErRCeAdfQ/88iz4ZNtsBDjH49K+REG01iqOInjOh92OuTK4ieb8JD3ufX5 SzApyibEXujuKPZHtomQICSPPgF/F7pYYrHPLmYkxvGfi5w4Eg8QDz3StGwlG+9L HmbuBZ9MF4q3mrdS78Ds8rRL58KdqzI31zW6AqJYzmb18ObtRCBbZZpXx4k+/gY1 XGOyNLnv7dAJiwxT5Hj3SPH0VUhHNc9ez8A74ysEe827MT1HpUVJozUkDVgEg+uV OyVG/KLUuXI6BI/l6Pt1akep1Nh50b5kFepk8c68mXYDm6A1mcZUYjI11eFDOR35 yj530vNRGJpJbXSbiWdmqyyg8cZ4KlL64Sq4rDBPpNU3tOV/R3TNJG9DNUSWqZoe JHgGe6yq0XUDFVI8SmyQSJbP9Qkij35rTs0cNMASmJ49EwCUv9aRkewSkKA7n1P/ pC/8XRW9DHhRUPVLRGN/NQIqT3fOZ3oF1aACWlAJvGk20R8oZzVViXLozBi6gE9U rTlwoUfxglSyoti0EHeN =7Tp+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
some self-publicity: I've made a GUI for mtx_mul~, look at http://markmail.org/message/mbxqnikey6xnjg3i?q=jmmmp+list:at%2Eiem%2Epd-list...
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:34 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2013-11-19 13:58, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
Has anyone experienced any buggy behavior by setting lots of outlets and inlets to a [mtx_*~]? I'm designing some hardware that will be using this object and the prototype, on a breadboard, behaves fine with 16 outlets and 16 inlets. Haven't tried more than that yet as it is quite cumbersome on a breadboard, so thought of asking if anyone knows of any limitations of this object.
the sky (and your processing power) is the limit.
Good to know! Thanks.
fmgadr IOhannes