Attached is another example:
- Select all the [clip] objects.
- Move them so the [vsl] overlaps them.
- Right-click the bottom [clip] and choose "To front". It works as
it should. 4. Now, with all the [clip] objects still selected, right-click on the same bottom [clip] and choose "To back". It deselects all the other clips and only moves the bottom [clip] to the back. But shouldn't it instead move all the selected objects behind the [vsl]?
You are correct. Just fixed this bug, changed the edit menu ordering and included to front/back options, added key shortcuts, added tidy up shortcut and increased its threshold which IMHO makes it much more usable.
HTH
--- On Mon, 11/22/10, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu Subject: Re: [PD] call for testers for L2Ork iteration of pd-extended (based on 0.42.x branch) To: "Jonathan Wilkes" jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list@iem.at Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 9:44 PM
Attached is another example:
- Select all the [clip] objects.
- Move them so the [vsl] overlaps them.
- Right-click the bottom [clip] and choose "To
front". It works as
it should. 4. Now, with all the [clip] objects still selected,
right-click on
the same bottom [clip] and choose "To back". It
deselects all the
other clips and only moves the bottom [clip] to the
back. But
shouldn't it instead move all the selected objects
behind the
[vsl]?
You are correct. Just fixed this bug, changed the edit menu ordering and included to front/back options, added key shortcuts, added tidy up shortcut and increased its threshold which IMHO makes it much more usable.
Regarding "tidy up"-- are you referring to XTOLERANCE, YTOLERANCE, and NHIST? If so, I posted a message awhile back with what seemed like some decent values, but in some cases it would swap the position of two objects in a row or column. Also, this behavior changed depending on the order in which those objects were created. (I have a feeling this is why those values are set so low.)
If you post another tar.gz with your new "tidy" I'll see if I can reproduce this behavior.
-Jonathan
HTH
Regarding "tidy up"-- are you referring to XTOLERANCE, YTOLERANCE, and NHIST? If so, I posted a message awhile back with
I set it to 20 20 15 respectively and it seems to do the trick in tests I did so far.
what seemed like some decent values, but in some cases it would swap the position of two objects in a row or column. Also, this behavior changed depending on the order in which those objects were created. (I have a feeling this is why those values are set so low.)
If you post another tar.gz with your new "tidy" I'll see if I can reproduce this behavior.
Oops, forgot to post this one, haven't I? :-)
Same place, same links:
http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/?page_id=56
HTH
Best wishes,
Ico
--- On Tue, 11/23/10, Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic ico@vt.edu Subject: RE: [PD] call for testers for L2Ork iteration of pd-extended (based on 0.42.x branch) To: "'Jonathan Wilkes'" jancsika@yahoo.com Cc: pd-list@iem.at Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 2:27 AM
Regarding "tidy up"-- are you
referring to XTOLERANCE,
YTOLERANCE, and NHIST? If so, I posted a message
awhile back with
I set it to 20 20 15 respectively and it seems to do the trick in tests I did so far.
what seemed like some decent values, but in some cases
it would
swap the position of two objects in a row or
column. Also, this
behavior changed depending on the order in which those
objects were
created. (I have a feeling this is why those
values are set so low.)
If you post another tar.gz with your new "tidy" I'll
see
if I can reproduce this behavior.
Oops, forgot to post this one, haven't I? :-)
Same place, same links:
Great, I'll play around with it a bit.
-Jonathan
HTH
Best wishes,
Ico
-
Ivica Ico Bukvic -
Jonathan Wilkes