Hi,
I have problems to get my motu 828 running with asio under Win2k. It only works with 8 channels but Pd reports that there are 10 (which is right). In case I use "c:\pd\bin\pd -verbose -asio -channels 10" to start Pd CPU usage goes up to 100%....
When working with 8 channels CPU usage is around 14% even with audio turned off (on a 1.8GHz P4!). Using the normal windows drivers works as usual.
I know there have been similar questions on this list before but I couldn't find any hints that helped me.... I would really appreciate if one of the 828 users out there could help! Ah, I've tried pd0.35 test 26 and 29, both do the same.
thanks,
Olaf
If you looke in pablio\pabio_pd_was.c you'll see: nbuffers = RoundUpToNextPowerOf2(nbuffers);
and nchannels != RoundUpToNextPowerOf2(nchannels)
Thats is why you can't run pd with 10 channesl (or 6 or 7 or 9, etc) because you value needs to be a power of 2. I'm running pd on win ME with the 828 and i can get a max input/output channels of 6 when i run pd -asio channels 8 because 2 of the channels are digital. I tried commenting out the set of lines regarding rounding to power of 2 but it does not work, i get no sound out what so ever.
so my question now is:
individually?
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Olaf Matthes wrote:
Hi,
I have problems to get my motu 828 running with asio under Win2k. It only works with 8 channels but Pd reports that there are 10 (which is right). In case I use "c:\pd\bin\pd -verbose -asio -channels 10" to start Pd CPU usage goes up to 100%....
When working with 8 channels CPU usage is around 14% even with audio turned off (on a 1.8GHz P4!). Using the normal windows drivers works as usual.
I know there have been similar questions on this list before but I couldn't find any hints that helped me.... I would really appreciate if one of the 828 users out there could help! Ah, I've tried pd0.35 test 26 and 29, both do the same.
thanks,
Olaf
Hello,
I've just discovered something...I was making a mistake earlier that was preventing multiverb~ from working on my computer.
I mistakenly thought that multiverb~ needed to be loaded like a library from the command line! (oops)
All is well. I will now try to implement the multiverb~ in my patch and sorry for the confusion.
Regards, Dave S