Hi,
There are few name clashes still remaining in pd. That doesn't bother that
much because usually they're repeated objects. But at least in the case of
scale it's annoying, since gem and maxlib have that, and with very
different functions.
it's possible to use the [maxlib/scale] hack if you're on pd-ext, but not
if you use maxlib.dll, in which you must make sure that one is loaded
before the other (and both simultaneously aren't possible). Wouldn't it be
better to change the names? or is it too late already?
Joao
It took a lot of effort to get anything renamed. I think namespaces
are the answer there, it gives each developer their own sandbox that
won't mess up other people's sandboxes. There are too many people to
coordinate, so instead we should structure the software so we don't
have to coordinate.
.hc
On May 6, 2006, at 4:17 PM, João Miguel Pais wrote:
Hi,
There are few name clashes still remaining in pd. That doesn't
bother that much because usually they're repeated objects. But at
least in the case of scale it's annoying, since gem and maxlib have
that, and with very different functions. it's possible to use the [maxlib/scale] hack if you're on pd-ext,
but not if you use maxlib.dll, in which you must make sure that one
is loaded before the other (and both simultaneously aren't
possible). Wouldn't it be better to change the names? or is it too
late already?Joao
-- Lugostr. 14 79100 Freiburg i. Br. Deutschland +49 (0)761 7074997 jmmmpais@googlemail.com http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand
I use scale and maxlib_scale on a daily basis without problems.
On 5/6/06, João Miguel Pais <jmmmpais@googlemail.com > wrote:
Hi,
There are few name clashes still remaining in pd. That doesn't bother that
much because usually they're repeated objects. But at least in the case of scale it's annoying, since gem and maxlib have that, and with very different functions. it's possible to use the [maxlib/scale] hack if you're on pd-ext, but not if you use maxlib.dll, in which you must make sure that one is loaded before the other (and both simultaneously aren't possible). Wouldn't it be better to change the names? or is it too late already?
Joao
-- Lugostr. 14 79100 Freiburg i. Br. Deutschland +49 (0)761 7074997 jmmmpais@googlemail.com http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
FYI: [maxlib_...] is the alternative naming built into the maxlib objects exactly for this purpose.
Best Urs
chris clepper schrieb:
I use scale and maxlib_scale on a daily basis without problems.
On 5/6/06, *João Miguel Pais* < jmmmpais@googlemail.com mailto:jmmmpais@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hi, There are few name clashes still remaining in pd. That doesn't bother that much because usually they're repeated objects. But at least in the case of scale it's annoying, since gem and maxlib have that, and with very different functions. it's possible to use the [maxlib/scale] hack if you're on pd-ext, but not if you use maxlib.dll, in which you must make sure that one is loaded before the other (and both simultaneously aren't possible). Wouldn't it be better to change the names? or is it too late already? Joao -- Lugostr. 14 79100 Freiburg i. Br. Deutschland +49 (0)761 7074997 jmmmpais@googlemail.com <mailto:jmmmpais@googlemail.com> http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp <http://www.puredata.org/Members/jmmmp> _______________________________________________ PD-list@iem.at <mailto:PD-list@iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list