i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array
it heppends just even in the helppatch ..
it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the values
it is unusable for me like this .... the help patch doesn't say anything about even or odd values of index so once i set the array by banging the msg box, i can get values for: 0 and below -> 1 , 2 -> 4 , 4 -> 2 , 6 -> 8 , 8 -> 5 while array contains:
1 4 2 8 5 6 1 4 2 8
so i just put:
|number | [* 2] | [tabread array99] | |number
^that gave me right values up to index[4], so where is the rest ??
can anyone help, please .
Hallo, ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk hat gesagt: // ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk wrote:
i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array
it heppends just even in the helppatch ..
it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the values
Sounds like a 64bit issue: Are you on a 64bit machine? If yes, you need to use the latest Pd, not pd-0.39.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk hat gesagt: // ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk wrote:
i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array
it heppends just even in the helppatch ..
it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the values
Sounds like a 64bit issue: Are you on a 64bit machine? If yes, you need to use the latest Pd, not pd-0.39.
yes i am. i got version 0.40-3
gcc-3.4.6 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Gentoo 3.4.6-r2, ssp-3.4.6-1.0, pie-8.7.10); tcl/tk 8.4;
..
what's the matter of this isssue? does anyone know? ..in general terms at least ....
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
You need version 0.41 (only out in a test version so far, but it seems quite stable at teh moment.)
cheers Miller
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:32:27PM +0000, ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk hat gesagt: // ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk wrote:
i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array
it heppends just even in the helppatch ..
it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the values
Sounds like a 64bit issue: Are you on a 64bit machine? If yes, you need to use the latest Pd, not pd-0.39.
yes i am. i got version 0.40-3
gcc-3.4.6 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Gentoo 3.4.6-r2, ssp-3.4.6-1.0, pie-8.7.10); tcl/tk 8.4;
..
what's the matter of this isssue? does anyone know? ..in general terms at least ....
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:37:44PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
You need version 0.41 (only out in a test version so far, but it seems quite stable at teh moment.)
cheers Miller
right, i see .. diff m_pd.h shows stuff about garray and define x86_64 etc ..
thanx.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 09:32:27PM +0000, ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk hat gesagt: // ild0012@londonmet.ac.uk wrote:
i have noticed that [tabread] doesn't work as i expected it just outputs too many zeroes, and only gives values for some of the elements of the array
it heppends just even in the helppatch ..
it actually gives not a zero only for the EVEN values of index .. . BUT for less then a half of the values
Sounds like a 64bit issue: Are you on a 64bit machine? If yes, you need to use the latest Pd, not pd-0.39.
yes i am.
i mean, i run gentoo linux on an athlon64 with CFLAGS = -march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe
i got version 0.40-3
gcc-3.4.6 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Gentoo 3.4.6-r2, ssp-3.4.6-1.0, pie-8.7.10); tcl/tk 8.4;
..
what's the matter of this isssue? does anyone know? ..in general terms at least ....
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
the [tabread] object is certainly well tested and working almost everywhere, so if it is not working as expected it might be your platform (which you haven't mentioned)
if you are using a 64bit-linux and a pd-version <0.41, consider an upgrade.
however, i haven't tried to fully read your bug description so i might be completely on the wrong track...
mfg.asdr IOhannes
-
Frank Barknecht -
ild0012＠londonmet.ac.uk -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Miller Puckette -
Steffen