(this reminds me: i have fixed bugs in [pix_buf] and [separator]. going to check these in)
If I have a pix_video that I want to texture map onto two seperate objects, and be able to manipulate each object's parameters individually without both objects being effected when I perform a rotate or translate, first I thought that the separator object would work to do this. But the separtaor always crashes PD when I have an active pix_video in the chain. So Rainer told me to us the pix_buf instead, but that doesn't work either. I'm on Windows 2000 with Gem 0.87; are the bugs you mention fixing responsible?
I can't get a clear answer of whether the separator is supposed to work. Does it work with the pix_film, _movie, _video objects on other platforms?
thanks for any clarification. alexander
(this reminds me: i have fixed bugs in [pix_buf] and [separator]. going to check these in)
If I have a pix_video that I want to texture map onto two seperate objects, and be able to manipulate each object's parameters individually without both objects being effected when I perform a rotate or translate, first I thought that the separator object would work to do this. But the separtaor always crashes PD when I have an active pix_video in the chain. So Rainer told me to us the pix_buf instead, but that doesn't work either. I'm on Windows 2000 with Gem 0.87; are the bugs you mention fixing responsible?
I can't get a clear answer of whether the separator is supposed to work. Does it work with the pix_film, _movie, _video objects on other platforms?
you want to use [separator] for this. try the Windows CVS build posted by Daniel Heckenberg for the fix: http://www.bogusfront.org
be warned that there is now a memory leak in [separator]...
cgc
thanks for any clarification. alexander
Ok. I installed the new CVS build and got [separator] going. But now Daniel Hackenberg's [pix_video_ds] no longer loads. When I start gem up, I get a pop up saying "the procedure entry point ?setModified@GemBase@@IAEXXZ could not be located in the dynamic link library gem.dll."
What does this mean? Everything seems to work fine except for the [pix_video_ds].
Thanks. Alexander
you want to use [separator] for this. try the Windows CVS build posted by Daniel Heckenberg for the fix: http://www.bogusfront.org
be warned that there is now a memory leak in [separator]...
Yes... this is because the pix_video_ds binary is built to link against GEM v0.87 and not the CVS version of GEM.
Given that pix_video_ds seems to be reasonably stable, I'll add it to CVS and post a new GEM CVS build binary soon (sometime this week).
Daniel
On 10/3/03 2:34 PM, "01ek" 01ek@sat.qc.ca wrote:
Ok. I installed the new CVS build and got [separator] going. But now Daniel Hackenberg's [pix_video_ds] no longer loads. When I start gem up, I get a pop up saying "the procedure entry point ?setModified@GemBase@@IAEXXZ could not be located in the dynamic link library gem.dll."
What does this mean? Everything seems to work fine except for the [pix_video_ds].
Thanks. Alexander
you want to use [separator] for this. try the Windows CVS build posted by Daniel Heckenberg for the fix: http://www.bogusfront.org
be warned that there is now a memory leak in [separator]...
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
01ek -
chris clepper -
Daniel Heckenberg