Hello I followed instruction from https://puredata.info/docs/faq/debian. I added "deb http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable main" in /etc/apt/sources.list. I used the stable keyword instead of testing because adding "deb http://apt.puredata.info/releases testing main" (as specified in https://puredata.info/docs/faq/debian) yields some errors. There is indeed no testing directory in http://apt.puredata.info/releases/dists/. I then did both "sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key 9f0fe587374bbe81" and "sudo apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key D63D3D09C39F5EEB".
When I do "sudo apt update", I get this error at the end: [...] Ign:3 http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable InRelease [...] Get:5 http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable Release [4870 B] [...] Get:7 http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable Release.gpg [904 B] Ign:7 http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable Release.gpg [...] W: GPG error: http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable Release: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 9F0FE587374BBE81 Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@guardianproject.info E: The repository 'http://apt.puredata.info/releases stable Release' is not signed. N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default. N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
Is it a known problem? Did I make a mistake somewhere?
Thank you for your time.
Best regards, Johan Mazel
Am 6. August 2020 20:40:38 MESZ schrieb Johan Mazel johan.mazel@gmail.com:
Hello I followed instruction from https://puredata.info/docs/faq/debian.
don't.
that information is about 10 years old and has become stale 7 years ago (or so).
revert all you did. then run "apt-get install pure-data" and enjoy.
mfg.hft.fsl IOhannes