hello,
i just add a filter in the nusmuk-audio lib svn. This is a multi-mode analog style filter.
i think analog fan will love it. If you like 8 bit music, or i you think that phasor~ is a good audio oscillator, this filter is not for you ;-)
It's sound characteristic can be adjusted, but since it's an abstraction, you can tune it more if you dig a bit in the patch. IMO, it sound is softer and can be closer to a moog filter than the bob~ object.
see attachment.
cheers c
sounds great!!!
thanks for sharing.
On 19 Feb 2016, at 20:06, cyrille henry ch@chnry.net wrote:
<filter.zip>
looks great! thanks.
just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead of multiplying the distortion outputs by [1, -2, 1, 0, 0 ] , you need to multiply by [0.5, -1, 0.5, 0, 0], then you get the same amplitude for the highpass as the other modes.
I'm gonna see what it sounds like to morph between filter modes with a line~ sweep. Hopefully it will work somewhat.
Matt
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Simon Iten itensimon@gmail.com wrote:
sounds great!!!
thanks for sharing.
On 19 Feb 2016, at 20:06, cyrille henry ch@chnry.net wrote:
<filter.zip>
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I seem to get the exact same output when using either of the 2 lowpass modes and the bandpass mode. Only the highpass seems different.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, i go bananas hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
looks great! thanks.
just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead of multiplying the distortion outputs by [1, -2, 1, 0, 0 ] , you need to multiply by [0.5, -1, 0.5, 0, 0], then you get the same amplitude for the highpass as the other modes.
I'm gonna see what it sounds like to morph between filter modes with a line~ sweep. Hopefully it will work somewhat.
Matt
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Simon Iten itensimon@gmail.com wrote:
sounds great!!!
thanks for sharing.
On 19 Feb 2016, at 20:06, cyrille henry ch@chnry.net wrote:
<filter.zip>
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
oops, ignore that comment about the lowpass and bandpass modes not working. It was my patching mistake. sorry!
you need $0 prefacing the delwrite~_delread~ names, or otherwise you can't load multiple instances.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, i go bananas hard.off@gmail.com wrote:
oops, ignore that comment about the lowpass and bandpass modes not working. It was my patching mistake. sorry!
yes, thanks. corrected on the svn. cheers c
Le 22/02/2016 08:06, i go bananas a écrit :
you need $0 prefacing the delwrite~_delread~ names, or otherwise you can't load multiple instances.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, i go bananas <hard.off@gmail.com mailto:hard.off@gmail.com> wrote:
oops, ignore that comment about the lowpass and bandpass modes not working. It was my patching mistake. sorry!
It's astounishing, this filter doesn't only sound like the SSM2040 chip, this patch also look like it's circuit implementation. http://www.schmitzbits.de/rs2040.html
Le 22/02/2016 10:39, cyrille henry a écrit :
yes, thanks. corrected on the svn. cheers c
Le 22/02/2016 08:06, i go bananas a écrit :
you need $0 prefacing the delwrite~_delread~ names, or otherwise you can't load multiple instances.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, i go bananas <hard.off@gmail.com mailto:hard.off@gmail.com> wrote:
oops, ignore that comment about the lowpass and bandpass modesnot working. It was my patching mistake. sorry!
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Le 22/02/2016 06:31, i go bananas a écrit :
looks great! thanks.
just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead of multiplying the distortion outputs by [1, -2, 1, 0, 0 ] , you need to multiply by [0.5, -1, 0.5, 0, 0], then you get the same amplitude for the highpass as the other modes.
If you put the filter on high pass and use a low cuttoff so that everything is passing throw the filter, then the original coefficient result in 0db gain between the input and the output of the filter. So, they look ok to me.
I'm gonna see what it sounds like to morph between filter modes with a line~ sweep. Hopefully it will work somewhat.
yes, it should.
cheers c
Matt
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 5:12 AM, Simon Iten <itensimon@gmail.com mailto:itensimon@gmail.com> wrote:
sounds great!!! thanks for sharing. > On 19 Feb 2016, at 20:06, cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net <mailto:ch@chnry.net>> wrote: > > <filter.zip> _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
cyrille henry -
i go bananas -
patrice colet -
Simon Iten