To Pd-announce:
Pd version 0.49-0test4 is available on http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.htm or (source only) via github: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data
cheers Miller
Pd-announce mailing list Pd-announce@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
@millerpuckette
Everything is running nice on the Windows land for 0.49-test4.
The installers are doing fine and ASIO and MIDI are working OK.
Known little thing: Something must be done to somehow be able to switch .pd file association to 32 or 64. The current behavior is that files (opened from the Explorer) are opened with the last Pd installation and if this installation is removed the other can't open files from the Explorer.
This might be solved by running a batch script from pd/bin that rewrites to the 'registry'. I'll do some tests.
:)
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
On 9/23/2018 2:10 AM, Miller Puckette wrote:
To Pd-announce:
Pd version 0.49-0test4 is available on http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.htm or (source only) via github: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data
cheers Miller
Pd-announce mailing list Pd-announce@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce _______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 2018-09-24 01:17, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
Known little thing: Something must be done to somehow be able to switch .pd file association to 32 or 64. The current behavior is that files (opened from the Explorer) are opened with the last Pd installation and if this installation is removed the other can't open files from the Explorer.
how does this work with other applications?
e.g. if .doc is associated with MicrosoftOffice and i install
LibreOffice, claiming the .doc extension, what happens if i then
uninstall LibreOffice?
This might be solved by running a batch script from pd/bin that rewrites to the 'registry'. I'll do some tests.
i think there should just be a button in the preferences that says something along the lines: "Open pd-patches with *this* version of Pd".
it would probably be better to handle this directly from Pd-GUI (that is: write the code in tcl, rather than bat).
also, i wonder how much of a problem this will actually be in the real world (that is: how many people will try to install the 32bit version and the 64bit version side by side, then decide that they want to ditch the one they installed last AND will be totally lost in re-installing the former (or doing file-assocications by hand).
i'm not saying this is not an issue (just trying to assess the priorities)
fgamsdr IOhannes
Attached batch file that should live on pd/bin.
i think there should just be a button in the preferences that says something along the lines: "Open pd-patches with *this* version of Pd".
it would probably be better to handle this directly from Pd-GUI (that is: write the code in tcl, rather than bat).
It will be very nice if that can be done. And if it also works from the zip app (very probable that this can be done) will be all that we need.
:)
Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.
On 9/24/2018 5:33 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2018-09-24 01:17, Lucas Cordiviola wrote:
Known little thing: Something must be done to somehow be able to switch .pd file association to 32 or 64. The current behavior is that files (opened from the Explorer) are opened with the last Pd installation and if this installation is removed the other can't open files from the Explorer.
how does this work with other applications?
e.g. if .doc is associated with MicrosoftOffice and i install
LibreOffice, claiming the .doc extension, what happens if i then
uninstall LibreOffice?
This might be solved by running a batch script from pd/bin that rewrites to the 'registry'. I'll do some tests.
i think there should just be a button in the preferences that says something along the lines: "Open pd-patches with *this* version of Pd".
it would probably be better to handle this directly from Pd-GUI (that is: write the code in tcl, rather than bat).
also, i wonder how much of a problem this will actually be in the real world (that is: how many people will try to install the 32bit version and the 64bit version side by side, then decide that they want to ditch the one they installed last AND will be totally lost in re-installing the former (or doing file-assocications by hand).
i'm not saying this is not an issue (just trying to assess the priorities)
fgamsdr IOhannes
Pd-list@lists.iem.atmailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Lucas Cordiviola -
Miller Puckette