Hi again,
After fixing the day's bugs, I've reissued Pd 0.35 test 6, both for linux nad windows... as usual, on
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software
cheers (and thanks for the quick bug reports...)
Miller
Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
After fixing the day's bugs, I've reissued Pd 0.35 test 6, both for linux nad windows cheers (and thanks for the quick bug reports...)
One minor glitch is remaining: the FONT BOMB bombs pd into eternity.
__ __
Frank Barknecht ____ ______ ____ __ trip\ \ / /wire ______
/ __// __ /__/ __// // __ \ / / __ \ ___\
/ / / ____/ / / / // ____// /\ \ ___\____ \
/_/ /_____/ /_/ /_//_____// / \ \_____\_____
/_/ _\
Hello list,
Has anyone done any work towards fuzzy logic constructs/objects for pd? Any thoughts on a port of Peter Elsea's LObjects for max?
Cheers, DC
www.ariada.uea.ac.uk/~dcasal --)+
hi list this is maybe off-topic and german only..., but still iŽd like to post this link, i think it could be of interest. i made a translation of a large part of millers html-pd-dokumentation http://www.parasitaere-kapazitaeten.net/Pd/doc_de/index.htm and i put the "fft and pd"-article to html http://www.parasitaere-kapazitaeten.net/Pd/fft_und_pd.htm marius.
hi Frank (and Miller:-),
yes... replacing 0 with x->gl_owner in glist_redraw() has not made any difference, because x->gl_owner is null anyway... and if dropped from within an abstraction, font bomb does not explode, but still behaves rather weird.
Krzysztof
Frank Barknecht wrote: ...
One minor glitch is remaining: the FONT BOMB bombs pd into eternity.
hi Miller,
that was quick! Now iemguis move around as they should, hslider works, [pd] box properties do not crash, compilation works, and you got rid of -- not even mentioned on pd-list -- click-on-array crash.
Btw. our (impatient pd-list posters') suggestion to use --disable-debug (or--enable-debug=no) to bypass compilation warnings was misleading, because the effect is just the opposite. The configure script forces -g option if only it sees _any_ variation of a `debug' argument. This is probably rude, but not really important.
Krzysztof
Miller Puckette wrote: ...
After fixing the day's bugs, I've reissued Pd 0.35 test 6, both for
Is this my imagination or do arrays behave the ol'way with test-6 ???
to be continued .... ( i hope not )
Yves/
Hi again,
After fixing the day's bugs, I've reissued Pd 0.35 test 6, both for linux nad windows... as usual, on
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software
cheers (and thanks for the quick bug reports...)
Miller
Which old way was that? Sorry, I can't remember what this refers to...
cheers Miller
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:15:45PM +0100, Yves Degoyon wrote:
Is this my imagination or do arrays behave the ol'way with test-6 ???
to be continued .... ( i hope not )
Yves/
Hi again,
After fixing the day's bugs, I've reissued Pd 0.35 test 6, both for linux nad windows... as usual, on
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/Software
cheers (and thanks for the quick bug reports...)
Miller