hi again,
I should have mention that I'm using pool 0.2.0, compiled on Aug 10 2004 17:14:50.
bye, thoralf.
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Hallo, Thoralf Schulze hat gesagt: // Thoralf Schulze wrote:
I should have mention that I'm using pool 0.2.0, compiled on Aug 10 2004 17:14:50.
That's one year ago! If it's true, you should upgrade to the newest version first.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "plak" @ http://footils.org/cms/show/44
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:20:39PM +0100, Thoralf Schulze wrote:
hi again,
I should have mention that I'm using pool 0.2.0, compiled on Aug 10 2004 17:14:50.
thats quite old, you should try the latest pool, but i remember even recent ones still not reflecting the correct data structure on saves/reloads (mutilating symbol/list differentiation) with the .dat or XML formats. PDContainer is much better in this regard but has a few quirks like you have to unset a key before you can update it, and only flat non-heirarchical namespaces..
bye, thoralf.
___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi,
thats quite old, you should try the latest pool, but i remember even recent ones still not reflecting the correct data structure on saves/reloads (mutilating symbol/list differentiation) with the .dat or XML formats.
as for all bugs it would be great to have patchers exhibiting the behavior. Otherwise i often don't have the time to search for it.
thanks, Thomas
Hi Thomas,
as for all bugs it would be great to have patchers exhibiting the behavior. Otherwise i often don't have the time to search for it.
Sorry for not replying earlier and for not attaching a patch - I really had a lot of stress the past few days ... So here's a simple patch that demonstrates how I cannot manage to let pool load data into subdirs. I'm still using pool 0.2.0, which is to the best of my knowledge the latest binary available for win - building the cvs version is not really an option in this case, since this would involve building a mingw-version of pd as well - I just don't have the time to do this right now.
hope this helps, thoralf.
ps: I won't be able to get back to you during the nxt two weeks or so - holidays in Amsterdam :-) pps: any PD stuff going on there?
How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
Hi Thoralf, thanks for the report... i see the problem - i haven't thought of the possibility to load folder hierarchies into subfolders... i'l fix that as soon as possible - it's not too easy. Latest binaries can always be found at http://grrrr.org/ext/beta .This is also where a bugfixed version of pool will appear when done.
as for all bugs it would be great to have patchers exhibiting the behavior. Otherwise i often don't have the time to search for it.
Btw. this was more directed to Carmen, since i'm not sure i understand the kind of bug he meant.
best greetings, Thomas
Thoralf Schulze schrieb:
Hi Thomas,
as for all bugs it would be great to have patchers exhibiting the behavior. Otherwise i often don't have the time to search for it.
Sorry for not replying earlier and for not attaching a patch - I really had a lot of stress the past few days ... So here's a simple patch that demonstrates how I cannot manage to let pool load data into subdirs. I'm still using pool 0.2.0, which is to the best of my knowledge the latest binary available for win - building the cvs version is not really an option in this case, since this would involve building a mingw-version of pd as well - I just don't have the time to do this right now.
hope this helps, thoralf.
ps: I won't be able to get back to you during the nxt two weeks or so - holidays in Amsterdam :-) pps: any PD stuff going on there?
___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi Thoralf, the problem is fixed.
- in order to read in a hierarchy you have to use ld(x)rec instead of
ld(x)dir 2) There was a problem with the recognition of directory names... this is fixed in the current beta (http://grrrr.org/ext/beta)
all the best, Thomas
Thoralf Schulze schrieb:
Hi Thomas,
as for all bugs it would be great to have patchers exhibiting the behavior. Otherwise i often don't have the time to search for it.
Sorry for not replying earlier and for not attaching a patch - I really had a lot of stress the past few days ... So here's a simple patch that demonstrates how I cannot manage to let pool load data into subdirs. I'm still using pool 0.2.0, which is to the best of my knowledge the latest binary available for win - building the cvs version is not really an option in this case, since this would involve building a mingw-version of pd as well - I just don't have the time to do this right now.
hope this helps, thoralf.
ps: I won't be able to get back to you during the nxt two weeks or so - holidays in Amsterdam :-) pps: any PD stuff going on there?
___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hallo!
PDContainer is much better in this regard but has a few quirks like you have to unset a key before you can update it, and only flat non-heirarchical namespaces..
what do you mean by you have to unset a key and flat non-heirarchical namespaces ?
LG Georg
bye, thoralf.
___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
what do you mean by you have to unset a key and flat non-heirarchical namespaces ?
h_map, set 3 4 krschi, then add ge. then set hacka 45 and add ge, get g3 will stll be krschi. you have to remove ge first..
and namespace must be a symbol but not a list (so you cant do the equiv of pool's 'dirs' or com.apple.whatever or ::pd::edit::cables etc..)
still kicks ass, even if i have to switch to gcc 3.3 to compile it ;)
Hallo!
h_map, set 3 4 krschi, then add ge. then set hacka 45 and add ge, get g3 will stll be krschi. you have to remove ge first..
yes - i know, thats bad ... I just thought some weeks ago if I should change that, because I think it won't break any patches ... what do you think ?
and namespace must be a symbol but not a list (so you cant do the equiv of pool's 'dirs' or com.apple.whatever or ::pd::edit::cables etc..)
of course it would be possible to make lists as namespaces, but I don't see any advantage? you could of course use pd::edit::cables as namespace - but yes, it would be a symbol ... but maybe I got the wrong idea because it's late and I just drunk a beer ;)
still kicks ass, even if i have to switch to gcc 3.3 to compile it ;)
that's on my todo list since tim mentioned it ...
LG Georg
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
-
Frank Barknecht -
Georg Holzmann -
ix -
ix＠replic.net
-
Thomas Grill -
Thoralf Schulze