From sympa-request@ircam.fr Mon May 13 10:08:57 2002 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:08:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: sympa-request@ircam.fr To: integer@www.god-emil.dk Subject: You have been removed from list jmax
You have been removed from list jmax.
Thanks for being with us.
more idiotik male fascism.
that lawsuit - it will be the first.
thank you chris.
nn.
well, your posts (at least here) are mostly ot and unreadable... [and you seem to have too much negative karma in your ego]
peace -andre
----- Original Message ----- From: integer@www.god-emil.dk To: ck@mamalala.de; pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: [PD]
From sympa-request@ircam.fr Mon May 13 10:08:57 2002 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:08:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: sympa-request@ircam.fr To: integer@www.god-emil.dk Subject: You have been removed from list jmax
You have been removed from list jmax.
Thanks for being with us.more idiotik male fascism.
that lawsuit - it will be the first.
thank you chris.
nn.
and i think i would say i do what i use to call love her? at least her what you call ego. sÃme.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Schmidt" andre@vju.info To: "PD-LiST" pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 12:44 PM Subject: Re: [PD]
well, your posts (at least here) are mostly ot and unreadable... [and you seem to have too much negative karma in your ego]
peace -andre
----- Original Message ----- From: integer@www.god-emil.dk To: ck@mamalala.de; pd-list@iem.kug.ac.at Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:45 AM Subject: [PD]
From sympa-request@ircam.fr Mon May 13 10:08:57 2002 Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:08:51 +0200 (MET DST) From: sympa-request@ircam.fr To: integer@www.god-emil.dk Subject: You have been removed from list jmax
You have been removed from list jmax.
Thanks for being with
us.
more idiotik male fascism.
that lawsuit - it will be the first.
thank you chris.
nn.
On Mon, 13 May 2002 13:10:11 +0200 "sme" marius.schebella@chello.at wrote:
and i think i would say i do what i use to call love her? at least her what you call ego.
it's "them".
And they were quite interesting about 5-6 years ago. Since then their creativity got replaced with hate for chris and it all went down the drain. Quite boring, frankly, in the past few years. What a waste.
Now,
I have attempted to compile xsample a few times... I'm on an iMac running Debian. I get the following error
g++ -c -O6 -funroll-loops -fmove-all-movables -frerun-loop-opt -finline-functions -DPD -I/usr/local/lib/pd/include -I/usr/local/lib/pd/flext inter.cpp -o ../pd-linux/inter.o inter.cpp: In method `void xinter::s_dsp()': inter.cpp:223: Internal compiler error. inter.cpp:223: Please submit a full bug report. inter.cpp:223: Internal compiler error: inter.cpp:223: See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. make: *** [../pd-linux/inter.o] Error 1
I didn't bother filing a bug report (yet) but I was wondering which version of gcc people use to compile it. Mine is 2.95.4. All other software compiles fine...
Thanks
./MiS
Michal Seta mis@creazone.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2002 13:10:11 +0200 "sme" marius.schebella@chello.at wrote:
Quite boring, frankly, in the past few years. What a waste.
True: time to set up that filter again.
I have attempted to compile xsample a few times... I'm on an iMac running Debian. I get the following error
g++ -c -O6 -funroll-loops -fmove-all-movables -frerun-loop-opt -finline-functions -DPD -I/usr/local/lib/pd/include -I/usr/local/lib/pd/flext inter.cpp -o ../pd-linux/inter.o inter.cpp: In method `void xinter::s_dsp()': inter.cpp:223: Internal compiler error. inter.cpp:223: Please submit a full bug report. inter.cpp:223: Internal compiler error: inter.cpp:223: See URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions. make: *** [../pd-linux/inter.o] Error 1
I had the same problem and tried to compile it with 3.0, which worked, but then it clashed with Gem, which I compiled with 2.95.4. So I now use the precompiled version that comes with the package (which also refuses to load together with Gem :): so now, when I want to use one these two I don't load the other one).
mik
Hi, mik hat gesagt: // mik wrote:
I had the same problem and tried to compile it with 3.0, which worked, but then it clashed with Gem, which I compiled with 2.95.4. So I now use the precompiled version that comes with the package (which also refuses to load together with Gem :): so now, when I want to use one these two I don't load the other one).
Hm, that conflict seems strange. I did compile PD and flext/xsample with gcc-3.0 and I also could not compile GEM 0.87 with 3.0 so I used 2.95 on Debian x86 for Gem. But I can use both together just fine, although I don't use Gem that often.
Ciao,
Frank Barknecht _ _______footils__
Hi Michal, hi Mik,
it's a shame that c++ compilers are that sensitive....
You could also try to comment out line 35 of main.h (// #define TMPLOPT). xsample may lose some speed but it's perhaps easier to digest for compilers.
greetings, Thomas
I have attempted to compile xsample a few times... I'm on an
iMac running Debian.
I get the following error
g++ -c -O6 -funroll-loops -fmove-all-movables -frerun-loop-opt
-finline-functions -DPD -I/usr/local/lib/pd/include -I/usr/local/lib/pd/flext inter.cpp -o ../pd-linux/inter.o
inter.cpp: In method `void xinter::s_dsp()': inter.cpp:223: Internal compiler error. inter.cpp:223: Please submit a full bug report. inter.cpp:223: Internal compiler error: inter.cpp:223: See
URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html for instructions.
make: *** [../pd-linux/inter.o] Error 1
I had the same problem and tried to compile it with 3.0, which worked, but then it clashed with Gem, which I compiled with 2.95.4. So I now use the precompiled version that comes with the package (which also refuses to load together with Gem :): so now, when I want to use one these two I don't load the other one).
mik
On Mon, 13 May 2002 23:01:05 +0200 "Thomas Grill" t.grill@gmx.net wrote:
You could also try to comment out line 35 of main.h (// #define TMPLOPT). xsample may lose some speed but it's perhaps easier to digest for compilers.
Ha! Thanks. that worked. Will have to upgrade the compilers, I guess...
./MiS
Michal Seta mis@creazone.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 May 2002 23:01:05 +0200 "Thomas Grill" t.grill@gmx.net wrote:
You could also try to comment out line 35 of main.h (// #define TMPLOPT). xsample may lose some speed but it's perhaps easier to digest for compilers.
Ha! Thanks. that worked. Will have to upgrade the compilers, I guess...
./MiS
Look out with that. If you change your C++ compiler, chances are big you'll have to recompile all your C++-related libraries.
mik
On Tue, 14 May 2002, mik wrote:
Look out with that. If you change your C++ compiler, chances are big you'll have to recompile all your C++-related libraries.
This is really one of the main problems with C++, keeping it portable over several compilers, thats why I think it is preferable not to use advanced C++ features. I know that C++ geeks would not agree with that attitude, because its fun using the advanced stuff..
Guenter
Hi,
This is really one of the main problems with C++, keeping it portable over several compilers, thats why I think it is preferable not to use advanced C++ features.
It's obvious and i agree that the lack of portability is a serious problem. On the other hand, i don't understand why linking C++ code (which is exported as standard C) to a C library (like compiling xsample for pd) poses a problem... can anyone give me indications about the problems with xsample, gem and pd? The only cross-compiler-problem that i can imagine by now is the linkage to the standard C++ libraries.
I know that C++ geeks would not agree with that attitude, because its fun using the advanced stuff..
It's not (merely) about fun. It's also about readability, modularity, time-saving, robustness.
greetings, Thomas
-
Andre Schmidt -
Frank Barknecht -
g�nter geiger -
integer＠www.god-emil.dk -
Michal Seta -
mik -
sme -
Thomas Grill