Hi all,
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
cheers Miller
PD-announce mailing list PD-announce@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
Mhm, yummie, yummie: "struct-template8: change (pointer)"
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
Mhm, yummie, yummie: "struct-template8: change (pointer)"
Ciao
yeee! great... i was waiting for this feature!
thanx
moritz
Me too... plan to start using it tonight :)
(For those of you who don't diff source code for your documentation, the outlet of "template" now sends a "change" message whenever a scalar is edited by hand.)
cheers Miller
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:33:58AM +0200, moritz wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
Mhm, yummie, yummie: "struct-template8: change (pointer)"
Ciao
yeee! great... i was waiting for this feature!
thanx
moritz
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Would this apply to "struct" as well?
I'm going to start using this as of now. Every single one of these new features sounds like a big improvement.
Where it says "reblocking only works between powers of two", does that mean that a subpatch inside a subpatch blocked at 100 could only be blocked at 25, 50, 100, 200, etc?
-Chuckk
On 8/16/06, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
Me too... plan to start using it tonight :)
(For those of you who don't diff source code for your documentation, the outlet of "template" now sends a "change" message whenever a scalar is edited by hand.)
cheers Miller
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 02:33:58AM +0200, moritz wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
Mhm, yummie, yummie: "struct-template8: change (pointer)"
Ciao
yeee! great... i was waiting for this feature!
thanx
moritz
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Would this apply to "struct" as well?
I'm going to start using this as of now. Every single one of these new features sounds like a big improvement.
Where it says "reblocking only works between powers of two", does that mean that a subpatch inside a subpatch blocked at 100 could only be blocked at 25, 50, 100, 200, etc?
i guess this is true if you manage to run your main patch at a blocksize of "100" (or another "power-of-2" multiple of 100); since the main block is fixed to power-of-2 values itself, it turns out that your subpatches must have sizes of "64", "128", ... (at least i haven't yet found a way to run pd-0.40 with blocksizes != 2^n)
mf.sadr IOhannes
On 9/8/06, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Where it says "reblocking only works between powers of two", does that mean that a subpatch inside a subpatch blocked at 100 could only be blocked at 25, 50, 100, 200, etc?
i guess this is true if you manage to run your main patch at a blocksize of "100" (or another "power-of-2" multiple of 100); since the main block is fixed to power-of-2 values itself, it turns out that your subpatches must have sizes of "64", "128", ... (at least i haven't yet found a way to run pd-0.40 with blocksizes != 2^n)
I see, that does seem to be the case. So maybe the wording in the release notes means that blocks will still operate if told !=2^n block sizes, but only at ==2^n block sizes. I note that sending "set 17" sets block size to 32, whereas v. 0.39-2 prints an error and leaves block size at 64.
I also just noticed that a 64-element array showing elements 0 to 63 shows the last one outside the graph, but it does so in 0.39-2 as well. Strange I never noticed.
Probably it just doesn't work right yet. I haven't tried 17 yet :) The 64-element table bounds problem is longstanding, I hope to fix it someday.
cheers Miller
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:31:59PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
On 9/8/06, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Chuckk Hubbard wrote:
Where it says "reblocking only works between powers of two", does that mean that a subpatch inside a subpatch blocked at 100 could only be blocked at 25, 50, 100, 200, etc?
i guess this is true if you manage to run your main patch at a blocksize of "100" (or another "power-of-2" multiple of 100); since the main block is fixed to power-of-2 values itself, it turns out that your subpatches must have sizes of "64", "128", ... (at least i haven't yet found a way to run pd-0.40 with blocksizes != 2^n)
I see, that does seem to be the case. So maybe the wording in the release notes means that blocks will still operate if told !=2^n block sizes, but only at ==2^n block sizes. I note that sending "set 17" sets block size to 32, whereas v. 0.39-2 prints an error and leaves block size at 64.
I also just noticed that a 64-element array showing elements 0 to 63 shows the last one outside the graph, but it does so in 0.39-2 as well. Strange I never noticed.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Miller Puckette hat gesagt: // Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
Mhm, yummie, yummie: "struct-template8: change (pointer)"
Yahoo!!! You've come a long way, baby!
Chris.
chris@mccormick.cx http://mccormick.cx
Hi Miller, the download link says "compiled for Macintosh OSX 10.4 (intel or ppc)" but "lipo -info pd" says: "Non-fat file: pd is architecture: i386" Won't run on ppc...
best greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
Damn... I thought they had made it as easy as "ld -arch i386 -arch ppc" but noooo... I'll have to go back and fondle the makefile.
thanks Miller
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 11:42:56PM +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi Miller, the download link says "compiled for Macintosh OSX 10.4 (intel or ppc)" but "lipo -info pd" says: "Non-fat file: pd is architecture: i386" Won't run on ppc...
best greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi Miller,
on my minimac/ppc under 10.4.7 , closing the test audio patch window
with dsp on results in
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
Reason: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at address: 0x00000000
0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
#1 0x00045b9c in dsp_tick () at d_ugen.c:336
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
#2 0x0003c9fc in sched_tick (next_sys_time=Cannot access memory at
address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
Cannot access memory at address 0x0
129904640) at m_sched.c:365
#3 0x0003cc84 in m_scheduler () at m_sched.c:460
#4 0x000025a4 in _start (argc=1, argv=0xbffffb98, envp=0xbffffba0)
at /SourceCache/Csu/Csu-46/crt.c:267
#5 0x00002418 in start ()
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
Compiling it on linux, I had to change '#include <s_stuff.c>' with '#include "s_stuff.c"' in s_audio_jack.c.
I know you don't use jack. :-)
Cheers,
c.
Miller Puckette wrote:
Hi all,
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
cheers Miller
PD-announce mailing list PD-announce@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
ola,
i've noticed that this new release breaks pdp, with the following error :
PDP INIT ERROR: pd symbol clash adding symbol pdp: new=f6fe1950 old=08c69358
and the corresponding code is this :
/* don't kill me for this one.. if the symbol is already defined and used, .. well, that's a problem but right now it seems a reasonable hack */
t_symbol *sret = dogensym(s->s_name, s); if (s != sret){ post("PDP INIT ERROR: pd symbol clash adding symbol %s: new=%08x old=%08x", s->s_name, s, sret); post("try loading pdp before other libraries");
of course, i load pdp before all other libraries..
puès, no time to fix it, just reporting.
saludos, sevy
Miller Puckette wrote:
Hi all,
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
cheers Miller
PD-announce mailing list PD-announce@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual: http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
And the first test version of DesireData 0.39.A should be there within a week. Here's some documentation from a user's perspective:
http://desiredata.goto10.org/wiki/UserDocs
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
And the first test version of DesireData 0.39.A should be there within a week. Here's some documentation from a user's perspective:
I browsed through this site and it shows amazing stuff. My question is: how can I test/use it? I'm on Windows and use pd 0.39-extended...
thanks,
Piotr
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Piotr Majdak wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
And the first test version of DesireData 0.39.A should be there within a week. Here's some documentation from a user's perspective: http://desiredata.goto10.org/wiki/UserDocs
I browsed through this site and it shows amazing stuff. My question is: how can I test/use it? I'm on Windows and use pd 0.39-extended...
I believe that Thomas Grill will soon publish DesireData for Windows and OSX, for a fee. (If I'm not too late about replying to his emails...)
Else, you could try to compile http://artengine.ca/desiredata/download/desiredata-0.39.A.pre1.tar.gz but this is a very unstable preview so don't expect to be able to do real work with it.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
Oh man I can't wait to try it out!
~Kyle
On 8/23/06, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Miller Puckette wrote:
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual: http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
And the first test version of DesireData 0.39.A should be there within a week. Here's some documentation from a user's perspective:
http://desiredata.goto10.org/wiki/UserDocs
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Miller Puckette wrote:
Hi all,
The first test version of Pd 0.40 (test03) is out on the usual:
http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/software.htm
cheers Miller
PD-announce mailing list PD-announce@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
ola..
is it possible to disabling the printout these "realize $1-bla --> blublub-bla"-messages?
for debugging it is not in every case so handy because i have sometimes hundred of $-variables and im searching for a simple "print"..
but a feature like [r realize] in pd would perhaps be interesting, i dont know now for what yet.
cheers
moritz
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 16:39 +0200, moritz wrote:
is it possible to disabling the printout these "realize $1-bla --> blublub-bla"-messages?
for debugging it is not in every case so handy because i have sometimes hundred of $-variables and im searching for a simple "print"..
since printing to the pd-window eats so much cpu-power, the realize-messages sometimes can be a waste of cpu. a disable-option would be nice.
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
-
Cesare Marilungo -
Chris McCormick -
Chuckk Hubbard -
Frank Barknecht -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Kyle Klipowicz -
Mathieu Bouchard -
Miller Puckette -
moritz -
Piotr Majdak -
Roman Haefeli -
Thomas Grill -
Yves Degoyon