I am getting a 'message stack overflow' error message (and the computer becomes non-responsive, though the sound is fine). I don't think the patch that does this is excessively complex. any ideas about how to locate the problem? I'm running the latest PD under winXP (when running on linux I get unrelated errors so I decided to try the win version).
thanks Oded
hi,
I read:
I am getting a 'message stack overflow' error message (and the computer becomes non-responsive, though the sound is fine). I don't think the patch
this is most commonly caused by some control rate message feedback, it happens occasionally when you mix up sends and receives as in:
[r foo] | . . do sth. complex enough to make it less ovious that we end up sending it back into foo again ... . . | [s foo]
that does this is excessively complex. any ideas about how to locate the problem?
well posting the patch might help
regards,
x
Oded Ben-Tal wrote:
well posting the patch might help
another tip: you might want to make a big button in your example-patch that says "press me, if you want the weird behaviour". this gives people who just want to have a quick look at your patch a faster start.
the problem is a message-feedback consisting of the following elements: "[i 10], [<=5], [sel 1], [5(" of course "5" is always "<= 5" so this will loop forever.
btw. there is no [trigger int] ([t i]) in pd. the only number pd knows of is float.
mfg.a.dr IOhannes
hi IOhannes,
there is no [t i], and there should be one, just like there is a truncating [int] object.
Currently, on import, [t i]s are incompatibly mapped to [t f]s (another common problem are trigger's constant arguments, and pack's initializers)
Krzysztof
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: ...
btw. there is no [trigger int] ([t i]) in pd. the only number pd knows of is float.
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Krzysztof Czaja wrote:
hi IOhannes,
there is no [t i], and there should be one, just like there is a truncating [int] object.
Currently, on import, [t i]s are incompatibly mapped to [t f]s (another common problem are trigger's constant arguments, and pack's initializers)
Yes, I would like to have constant trigger args too .. should not be hard to add .. any takers ?
Guenter
Krzysztof
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: ...
btw. there is no [trigger int] ([t i]) in pd. the only number pd knows of is float.
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at to manage your subscription (including un-subscription) see http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
CK -
guenter geiger -
IOhannes m zmoelnig -
Krzysztof Czaja -
Oded Ben-Tal