hope this is 't a RTFM question, but i don't recall seeing it..... ;-)
it appears that outlet~ and inlet~ autosum their inputs, as does dac~.
so what is the benefit of using a +~ object? is it necessary at all?
--just looking for ways around throw~ and catch~ without using tons of +~... the former objects seem to give me immense trouble under linux.
best, d.
At 13:08 26/09/03 +0200, derek@x-i.net wrote:
hope this is 't a RTFM question, but i don't recall seeing it..... ;-)
it appears that outlet~ and inlet~ autosum their inputs, as does dac~.
it seems most objects (all?) that have a signal input do this. i often use this, but i believe miller once recommended not to rely on it..
groetjes,
xof
kristof lauwers
kristof.lauwers@logosfoundation.org http://kristoflauwers.de.vu
You can rely on it all right... I just caution against over-using it as a matter of style; it's more readable if the "+~" is explicit. Also, Pd makes no attempt to re-use the sums if you add the same signals more than once.
cheers Miller
On Fri, Sep 26, 2003 at 08:42:57PM +0200, kristof lauwers wrote:
At 13:08 26/09/03 +0200, derek@x-i.net wrote:
hope this is 't a RTFM question, but i don't recall seeing it..... ;-)
it appears that outlet~ and inlet~ autosum their inputs, as does dac~.
it seems most objects (all?) that have a signal input do this. i often use this, but i believe miller once recommended not to rely on it..
groetjes,
xof
kristof lauwers
kristof.lauwers@logosfoundation.org http://kristoflauwers.de.vu
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
derek＠x-i.net -
kristof lauwers -
Miller Puckette