hi!
I'm trying to develop a audio triggered video tool based on pd and director for mac os x.
The idea so far is to let pd analyze and handle audio data and communicate values to director, which controls the video output and sends control signals to pd.
My questions... ;-) Would you recommend this software combination? How good is Video performance with Macromedia Director? Which is the best way to communicate with director (eg TCP?) and how about lag time?
any comments are helpful as i haven't started yet...! thx so long! Fares
hi,
have you ever tried to use gem for video output control. I have just published video60 on sourceforge:
http://nemosomen.sourceforge.net
gem & pd needed
" finally released the first prototype of our control-building framework. video60 was developed combining conceptual prototypes from visual live performances by plankton labs. It offers positioning, mapping-effects, alpha values, movie Presets, Presets, blending of presets, 8 Layers, 8 preloadable Films, low-performace movie flashes and first automatations (loop-arrays, oneshot-arrays) which can be connected to every value video60 can be run on one computer or as distributed render environement with preview on the control-computer
documentation is at work, see here and under http://labs.plankton.net to find newest documentation
thx to monolulu, thomas wurzer, christof huemer and all participants from schmiede."
automatation and gem/pidip feature usage will be improved the next weeks
Am Don, 2003-06-19 um 17.55 schrieb Fares Kayali:
hi!
I'm trying to develop a audio triggered video tool based on pd and director for mac os x.
The idea so far is to let pd analyze and handle audio data and communicate values to director, which controls the video output and sends control signals to pd.
My questions... ;-) Would you recommend this software combination? How good is Video performance with Macromedia Director? Which is the best way to communicate with director (eg TCP?) and how about lag time?
any comments are helpful as i haven't started yet...! thx so long! Fares
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
hi
I'm trying to develop a audio triggered video tool based on pd and director for mac os x.
The idea so far is to let pd analyze and handle audio data and communicate values to director, which controls the video output and sends control signals to pd.
My questions... ;-) Would you recommend this software combination?
Depends on what you want to achive. director can be pretty bad for many things, but for some others is good, allowing to work very fast...
How good is Video performance with Macromedia Director?
Not very good, but it deppends again on what exactly you want to do with the video
Which is the best way to communicate with director (eg TCP?) and how about lag time?
On OS9 there is a Xtra for director called OSCar that allows director to send (but not receive) OSC. But this doesnt work on OSX. I would try to see if the external for PD called Flashserver works on OSX. i am not sure about this, but si far is the best way to get bidireccional communication between PD and director (at least under windows)
have a look at this exmples i prepared for a workshop, they might be useful for you, there are also some other methods explainied or mentioned. http://www.ixi-software.net/iua
if you discover better way please let me know!
enrike@ixi-software.net schrieb:
I would try to see if the external for PD called Flashserver works on OSX. i am not sure about this, but si far is the best way to get bidireccional communication between PD and director (at least under windows)
The latest version has a binary for OS X included. It seems to work but I only did some short tests, no 'real life' conditions.
http://www.akustische-kunst.org/puredata/flash/
Olaf
----- Original Message ----- From: enrike@ixi-software.net To: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [PD] pd & director
hi
I'm trying to develop a audio triggered video tool based on pd and
director for mac os x.
The idea so far is to let pd analyze and handle audio data and
communicate values to director, which controls the video output and sends control signals to pd.
there is aasfft xtra for director that does fast fourier transform on live audio-in , so maybe you dont need pd here (os-x version soon to be released), http://www.bonneville.nl/cps/ - another xtra with a lot of audio possibilities , looks like simplified pd more or less (150 euro unfortunatelly)
How good is Video performance with Macromedia Director?
I was developing an interactive instalation where video playback speed was controlled with live audio-in level and after testing pd + gem and director
than pd there. (everything on windoze)
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
Hi everybody
(
I have just suscribed to this mailing list. I have used Pure Data for about 4
months (and GEM sometimes), for various applications, under Linux and Windows.
)
I have a question about spectral synthesis.
I saw a patch (in Miller Puckette's book, " Theory and Techniques of Electronic Music ") that performs spectral synthesis like this : there is a bank of sine oscillators, and the amplitude of each sine is controlled by a graphic array.
I tried to do this a bit differently before, using rifft~ and a graphic array. The idea was to resynthesize a sound from spectral data directly drawn in the array, unfortunately it didn't work. Maybe rifft~ works with rfft~ only ? I started from a classic analysis / resynthesis patch and used the resynthesis only.
Has anyone managed to do (re)synthesis (without any actual analysis : the result of the analysis is drawn directly in an array) with rifft~ ?
Thank you very much
Julien
On Friday 20 June 2003 14:37, julien.breval@tremplin-utc.net wrote:
hi julien,
creb (http://zwizwa.fartit.com/pd/creb) has some extra objects to do spectral synthesis, with the ability to do separate pitch and timbre synthesis using the dynwav~ object.
dynwav is like tabread~, only it uses a dsp buffer as the wave table. you can set it's size using the block~ object. this is not really necessary, but it eliminates the need to use an array. it also interpolates between 2 successive buffers, so you don't need to care about overlap adding either.
there are some other objects you can use
generate spectral data.
pd's rfft~: (DC, NY, 1R, 1I, 2R, 2I, ...) the different ordering works better with diag~ and bdiag~. (if you combine bdiag~ with ibfft~ you get a form of scanned synthesis / additive synthesis hybrid). also, if you send a continuous signal (i.e a sine) as a spectrum, this ordering is easier to use if you don't care to much about the phase of the sines.
instead of fft to build the spectra.
phasor~ or similar objects. it enables you to set the number of oscillations in a buffer and the shift (drift) of the waveform independently. i.e. to construct a comb filter effect.
hope this is useful,
tom
Hi everybody
( I have just suscribed to this mailing list. I have used Pure Data for about 4 months (and GEM sometimes), for various applications, under Linux and Windows. )
I have a question about spectral synthesis.
I saw a patch (in Miller Puckette's book, " Theory and Techniques of Electronic Music ") that performs spectral synthesis like this : there is a bank of sine oscillators, and the amplitude of each sine is controlled by a graphic array.
I tried to do this a bit differently before, using rifft~ and a graphic array. The idea was to resynthesize a sound from spectral data directly drawn in the array, unfortunately it didn't work. Maybe rifft~ works with rfft~ only ? I started from a classic analysis / resynthesis patch and used the resynthesis only.
Has anyone managed to do (re)synthesis (without any actual analysis : the result of the analysis is drawn directly in an array) with rifft~ ?
Thank you very much
Julien
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list