What are the rules about distributing this?
Pd from Miller is released with a BSD license, so that's easy. But
Pd-extended is released under the GNU GPL because most of the code in
CVS is GPL'd, so that makes things more complicated. But it would be
quite nice to be able to distribute FFTease built-in to Pd-extended.
.hc
On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:01 PM, Eric Lyon wrote:
FFTease is a collection of externals that do various kinds of spectral sound processing - cross synthesis, spectral sampling, spectral shaping, spectral tuning, spectral reanimation, and so forth. The externals were originally designed for MaxMSP by Christopher Penrose and myself. The new version (FFTease 2.5) is designed for both Pd and MaxMSP. It has been compiled for Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows XP.
FFTease 2.5 is available at:
http://www.arts.manchester.ac.uk/subjectareas/music/academicstaff/ ericlyon/software/fftease/
or
Best,
Eric
p.s. For various reasons the source code is not posted at the above site, but anyone who is interested is welcome to contact me offline.
PD-announce mailing list PD-announce@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-announce
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during
that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big
Business, for Wall Street and the bankers.
- General Smedley Butler
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What are the rules about distributing this? Pd from Miller is released with a BSD license, so that's easy. But Pd-extended is released under the GNU GPL because most of the code in CVS is GPL'd, so that makes things more complicated. But it would be quite nice to be able to distribute FFTease built-in to Pd-extended.
It depends which flavour of BSD license it is. Old BSD can't be mixed with GPL. SIBSD can be mixed and is the result of an agreement between Berkeley University and Stallman/FSF. Additional clauses on top of SIBSD are not ok unless they are clauses that are found in the GPL (or are equivalent of parts of clauses found in the GPL).
BTW, where's the source code of that release of FFT? I don't see the source available on the author's page. (I am blind, right?)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
eric on pd osx 38.4 trying morphine and burrow when testing one example ,,fine closing and loading a new help file gives
link error 0 dyld: pd multiple definitions of symbol _bitrv2 /usr/local/lib/pd/morphine~.pd_darwin definition of _bitrv2 /usr/local/lib/pd/pvwarp~.pd_darwin definition of _bitrv2
On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What are the rules about distributing this? Pd from Miller is released with a BSD license, so that's easy. But Pd-extended is released under the GNU GPL because most of the code in CVS is GPL'd, so that makes things more complicated. But it would be quite nice to be able to distribute FFTease built-in to Pd-extended.
It depends which flavour of BSD license it is. Old BSD can't be mixed with GPL. SIBSD can be mixed and is the result of an agreement between Berkeley University and Stallman/FSF. Additional clauses on top of SIBSD are not ok unless they are clauses that are found in the GPL (or are equivalent of parts of clauses found in the GPL).
BTW, where's the source code of that release of FFT? I don't see the source available on the author's page. (I am blind, right?)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Jan 31, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What are the rules about distributing this? Pd from Miller is released with a BSD license, so that's easy. But Pd-extended is released under the GNU GPL because most of the code in
CVS is GPL'd, so that makes things more complicated. But it would be quite
nice to be able to distribute FFTease built-in to Pd-extended.It depends which flavour of BSD license it is. Old BSD can't be mixed
with GPL. SIBSD can be mixed and is the result of an agreement between
Berkeley University and Stallman/FSF. Additional clauses on top of SIBSD are
not ok unless they are clauses that are found in the GPL (or are equivalent of parts of clauses found in the GPL).BTW, where's the source code of that release of FFT? I don't see the source available on the author's page. (I am blind, right?)
He said they are not currently distributing the source.
.hc ________________________________________________________________________ ____
"Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
related to the telescope."
-Edsger
Dykstra
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
What are the rules about distributing this?
the homepage states (in red!): "FFTease may be used freely for any artistic or research purpose." which i consider to be _not_ compatible with the GPL.
matju: quoting eric: "p.s. For various reasons the source code is not posted at the above site, but anyone who is interested is welcome to contact me offline." (although i am somewhat interested in the sources, i don't think that i will contact eric _offline_)
mfg.adsr IOhannes