I sometimes just get the receive as the "master receive", and then channel it down in sub receives that are numbered, and I use trigger.
something like
[r a] | [t f f] | | | [s a1] | [s a2]
and then "a1" goes to where it first needs to be sent to.
it doesnt look confusing in the code
cheers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 2011-08-04 16:08, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
I sometimes just get the receive as the "master receive", and then channel it down in sub receives that are numbered, and I use trigger.
something like
[r a] | [t f f] | | | [s a1] | [s a2]
and then "a1" goes to where it first needs to be sent to.
but why do you use [s a] in the first place then? wouldn't it be way simpler to replace [s a] by
| [t a a] | | [s a2] [s a1]
?
fgmasdr IOhannes