hello
|0, 10 200 ( <-- click here | [line ] | [print ] . . this prints the following: .
print: 0 print: 0 <-- ??? print: 1 print: 2 print: 3 print: 4 print: 5 print: 6 print: 7 print: 8 print: 9 print: 10
Why should line repeat zero in this case? If you use "set" you lose the first zero (which is anyway normal) but you still get the second one. Shouldn't line start with the first step instead of repeating its last state?
ciao
First, you output 0, then you go from 0 to 10 in 200 ms, no ? ++
Jack
Le lundi 15 février 2010 à 23:44 +0100, ypatios a écrit :
hello
|0, 10 200 ( <-- click here | [line ] | [print ] . . this prints the following: .
print: 0 print: 0 <-- ??? print: 1 print: 2 print: 3 print: 4 print: 5 print: 6 print: 7 print: 8 print: 9 print: 10
Why should line repeat zero in this case? If you use "set" you lose the first zero (which is anyway normal) but you still get the second one. Shouldn't line start with the first step instead of repeating its last state?
ciao
-- ypatios _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On 16 February 2010 00:13, Jack jack@rybn.org wrote:
First, you output 0, then you go from 0 to 10 in 200 ms, no ?
Yes, but why repeat 0 while going from 0 to 10?
For example, if you want to go from -10 to 0 and then from there to 10 you would get something like:
... -3 -2 -1 0 (pause) 0 1 2 3 ...
here 0 is repeated, something that i don't find very practical. I could always use a [change ] but then again there would be a time gap, wouldn't it?
In 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, etc. Between 0 and 0 there is no 'time' in logical time. It is like a [trigger]. So, using a change to get 0, 1, 2, 3 should be OK. ++
Jack
Le mardi 16 février 2010 à 00:35 +0100, ypatios a écrit :
On 16 February 2010 00:13, Jack jack@rybn.org wrote: First, you output 0, then you go from 0 to 10 in 200 ms, no ?
Yes, but why repeat 0 while going from 0 to 10?
For example, if you want to go from -10 to 0 and then from there to 10 you would get something like:
... -3 -2 -1 0 (pause) 0 1 2 3 ...
here 0 is repeated, something that i don't find very practical. I could always use a [change ] but then again there would be a time gap, wouldn't it?
-- ypatios
On 16 February 2010 00:44, Jack jack@rybn.org wrote:
In 0, 0, 1, 2, 3, etc. Between 0 and 0 there is no 'time' in logical time. It is like a [trigger]. So, using a change to get 0, 1, 2, 3 should be OK.
Hmm, i guess you're right. Well, just for the record, i got feedback from a fellow max user and it seems that max's line does not repeat its last state.
it's just a matter of taste maybe..
thanks jack
alabala
-
Jack -
ypatios