hello,
i'm having a problem with the [open( and [auto( messages for
[pix_film] : i have an abstraction (see attachment) that responds to
a [read <movieName( in the right inlet by setting [auto 0(, then
calling [open(. if i send a successive [start( in the right inlet,
[auto 1( will be sent. i need to insert a stupid delay because
otherwise the [auto 1( is swallowed. that delay is only safe in the
order of some 100 milliseconds. i want this patch to be clean without
any experimental delayed messages. is there a way to determine when
pix_film is done with initializing the movie and when it will be
ready to accept the auto message?
thanks for help! ciao, -sciss-
The auto state is not reset when each film is loaded. You can set auto before any film loads and it should stick. Why do you set auto 0 at all?
On 3/9/07, Sciss contact@sciss.de wrote:
hello,
i'm having a problem with the [open( and [auto( messages for [pix_film] : i have an abstraction (see attachment) that responds to a [read <movieName( in the right inlet by setting [auto 0(, then calling [open(. if i send a successive [start( in the right inlet, [auto 1( will be sent. i need to insert a stupid delay because otherwise the [auto 1( is swallowed. that delay is only safe in the order of some 100 milliseconds. i want this patch to be clean without any experimental delayed messages. is there a way to determine when pix_film is done with initializing the movie and when it will be ready to accept the auto message?
thanks for help! ciao, -sciss-
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list