isn't it right, that we should use [i] instead of [f] every time making a counter which won't ever think of something in between 0 and 1 or 2 and 3 ..!!
Doesn't really matter as along as you are doing [+ 1]. [float] is
actually the native format for Pd, [int]/[i] involved conversion.
.hc
On Nov 3, 2007, at 10:18 PM, ilya .d wrote:
isn't it right, that we should use [i] instead of [f] every time
making a counter which won't ever think of something in between 0 and 1 or 2 and 3 ..!!
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste
no, I think every i is automatically reformatted into f when passed to next object. maybe I am wrong... marius.
ilya .d wrote:
isn't it right, that we should use [i] instead of [f] every time making a counter which won't ever think of something in between 0 and 1 or 2 and 3 ..!!
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hallo, ilya .d hat gesagt: // ilya .d wrote:
isn't it right, that we should use [i] instead of [f] every time making a counter which won't ever think of something in between 0 and 1 or 2 and 3 ..!!
IMO all counters should count in whole numbers and be scaled afterwards. If your counter is built as it should with the idiom: "bang"->[f ]x[+ 1] it will never become a non-whole number because of the "1". Then the conversion to integer with [int] is superfluous.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:07:05PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, ilya .d hat gesagt: // ilya .d wrote:
isn't it right, that we should use [i] instead of [f] every time making a counter which won't ever think of something in between 0 and 1 or 2 and 3 ..!!
IMO all counters should count in whole numbers and be scaled afterwards. If your counter is built as it should with the idiom: "bang"->[f ]x[+ 1] it will never become a non-whole number because of the "1". Then the conversion to integer with [int] is superfluous.
CCiao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
right i see now. i was just thinking memory- and flop- wise .
i see, so float is going done the wire anyway. ok.
thanx.