OK, how about this one (I'll ask this time before filing a report): Copying and pasting a group of objects creates them in the reverse order that the originals were created... this can be seen by incrementing a [value] object inside of an abstraction, then copying and pasting a number of them, i.e. create: 1 2 copy, paste and you'll get 4 3
I can make a patch demonstrating this if necessary, but I won't bother if this is known and there is reason for it.
It's an issue for me as I'm doing "instancing" in my abstractions and copy/pasting results in a "snaking" stream of instance-IDs
1 2 3 4 8 7 6 5
etc.
Again, if none of this makes sense give the word and I'll show an example.
Hallo, Luke Iannini (pd) hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
OK, how about this one (I'll ask this time before filing a report): Copying and pasting a group of objects creates them in the reverse order that the originals were created... this can be seen by incrementing a [value] object inside of an abstraction, then copying and pasting a number of them, i.e. create: 1 2 copy, paste and you'll get 4 3
I can make a patch demonstrating this if necessary, but I won't bother if this is known and there is reason for it.
It's an issue for me as I'm doing "instancing" in my abstractions and copy/pasting results in a "snaking" stream of instance-IDs
1 2 3 4 8 7 6 5
etc.
Again, if none of this makes sense give the word and I'll show an example.
If it's not too much trouble an example patch would be great because I don't really understand what you mean here.
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
Well, the problem is less serious than I thought: Try the included file. I am incrementing an instance counter each time an abstraction is created. If you copy and paste, or just duplicate the row of [anabst] objects, you'll see that the next row is created in the reverse order of the original row.
I had thought that this persisted (and could swear that I just saw it happen) upon reloading the patch with the "pasted" row saved inside, but I can't reproduce that now so I'll assume I'm wrong.
This is a pretty minor issue in that case : ) (and I can't quite remember the specific case in which it was bugging me at the moment; I'll post when I do)
On 12/31/06, Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
Hallo, Luke Iannini (pd) hat gesagt: // Luke Iannini (pd) wrote:
OK, how about this one (I'll ask this time before filing a report): Copying and pasting a group of objects creates them in the reverse order that the originals were created... this can be seen by incrementing a [value] object inside of an abstraction, then copying and pasting a number of them, i.e. create: 1 2 copy, paste and you'll get 4 3
I can make a patch demonstrating this if necessary, but I won't bother if this is known and there is reason for it.
It's an issue for me as I'm doing "instancing" in my abstractions and copy/pasting results in a "snaking" stream of instance-IDs
1 2 3 4 8 7 6 5
etc.
Again, if none of this makes sense give the word and I'll show an example.
If it's not too much trouble an example patch would be great because I don't really understand what you mean here.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list