I hope I allowed to attach files this way here and those are the right one. Seems like [bonk~] is "dead" in patches I made before installation. Even retyping name in an object don't give a change. Newly created objects works well except argument error.

Thank you.

2010/1/16 Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu

Sounds like some argument that was allowed in the old version no longer works in the new one... Could you post the text of the bonk object so I can check it?

thanks Miller

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 07:09:50PM +0200, Gintaras Lau. wrote:

...

Hello,

I'm a pd Vanilla user and since I upgraded to ubuntu 9.10 [bonk~] unusually respond to parameter change (tresh.,mask etc.). It worked on 9.04.

On strtup pd outputs:

bonk version 1.3 error: usage is: bonk [-npts #] [-hop #] [-nsigs #] [-nfilters #] [-halftones #] ... you might be able to track this down from the Find menu. ... [-overlap #] [-firstbin #] [-spew #] error: usage is: bonk [-npts #] [-hop #] [-nsigs #] [-nfilters #] [-halftones #] ... [-overlap #] [-firstbin #] [-spew #] error: usage is: bonk [-npts #] [-hop #] [-nsigs #] [-nfilters #] [-halftones #] ... [-overlap #] [-firstbin #] [-spew #]

answer appreciated.

...

---

Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

An object is not in a red dashed contour in my patches and your patch creates a bonk objected. Previous situation was "rain of bangs" no matter what threshold (or other) parameter I set. An old file objects work from now on. I opened a patch retyped object name [bonk~] with no change and wrote to list for help because of expanding changes. After a time opened file works in a previous manner, what means O.K.

No magic with arguments yet. The number of error lines in pd console related to number of [bonk~ -ntps#,..] objects that is in a patch. Object with no argument not cause an error to console.

Thank you Gintaras

2010/1/16 Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu:

So do I understand right that, when you simply type "bonk~" into an object box without arguments, you're getting the error messages?

Also, I'm wondering how your "old" patches can't find the bonk~ object at all.  Could you try this patch:

#N canvas 0 0 448 298 10; #X obj 97 65 bonk~;

and see what happens?

thanks Miller

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:54:55PM +0200, Gintaras Lau. wrote:

...

I hope I allowed to attach files this way here and those are the right one. Seems like [bonk~] is "dead" in patches I made before installation. Even retyping name in an object don't give a change. Newly created objects works well except argument error.

Thank you.

2010/1/16 Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu

...

Sounds like some argument that was allowed in the old version no longer works in the new one... Could you post the text of the bonk object so I can check it?

thanks Miller

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 07:09:50PM +0200, Gintaras Lau. wrote:

...

Hello,

I'm a pd Vanilla user and since I upgraded to ubuntu 9.10 [bonk~] unusually respond to parameter change (tresh.,mask etc.). It worked  on 9.04.

On strtup pd outputs:

bonk version 1.3 error: usage is: bonk [-npts #] [-hop #] [-nsigs #] [-nfilters #] [-halftones #] ... you might be able to track this down from the Find menu. ... [-overlap #] [-firstbin #] [-spew #] error: usage is: bonk [-npts #] [-hop #] [-nsigs #] [-nfilters #] [-halftones #] ... [-overlap #] [-firstbin #] [-spew #] error: usage is: bonk [-npts #] [-hop #] [-nsigs #] [-nfilters #] [-halftones #] ... [-overlap #] [-firstbin #] [-spew #]

answer appreciated.

...

---

Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list