On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, shreeswifty wrote:
pd-GEM on OSX is pretty darn cool too, while pd-Gem linux has always
been a
little shakey.
:(
hurts a bit.
aww, i don't think he meant anything personal by it. ;)
i would be curious to know why pat has found GEM on linux 'a little shakey'. i'm not aware of any bugs that affect all the platforms' stability. maybe he is referring to the problems that can arise from the config and setup of support libs on Linux? i know that has frustrated me on more than one occasion.
cgc
Guenter
yes i did not mean it the way it sounded, i was of course referring to the difficult install. yet again, i was coming from the new linux user attitude
sorry for the confusion
On Sunday, December 14, 2003, at 06:44 PM, cgc wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, shreeswifty wrote:
pd-GEM on OSX is pretty darn cool too, while pd-Gem linux has
always been a
little shakey.
:(
hurts a bit.
aww, i don't think he meant anything personal by it. ;)
i would be curious to know why pat has found GEM on linux 'a little shakey'. i'm not aware of any bugs that affect all the platforms' stability. maybe he is referring to the problems that can arise from the config and setup of support libs on Linux? i know that has frustrated me on more than one occasion.
cgc
Guenter
PD-list mailing list PD-list@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-list
-
cgc -
Patrick Pagano